Foram encontradas 140 questões.
Acerca dos órgãos do Sistema Único de Segurança Pública (SUSP), meios e instrumentos da Política Nacional de Segurança Pública e Defesa Social (PNSPDS), assinale a afirmativa correta.
Provas
A Força Nacional de Segurança Pública constitui instrumento de cooperação federativa para execução de serviços imprescindíveis à preservação da ordem pública e da incolumidade das pessoas e do patrimônio.
Com relação à cooperação federativa no âmbito da segurança pública, analise os itens a seguir.
I. A composição do efetivo da Força Nacional de Segurança se restringe a militares e servidores das atividades-fim dos órgãos de segurança pública, do sistema prisional e de perícia criminal que se encontrem em atividade, sendo vedada a integração de inativos e reservistas.
II. Os servidores civis e militares dos Estados e do Distrito Federal que participarem de atividades da Força Nacional de Segurança Pública farão jus ao recebimento de diária enquanto mobilizados em razão de deslocamento da sede para outro território nacional, sendo custeada pelo Fundo Nacional de Segurança Pública e, excepcionalmente, à conta de dotação orçamentária da União.
III. A diária a que fazem jus os servidores civis e militares mobilizados no âmbito do programa da Força Nacional de Segurança Pública não será computada para efeito de adicional de férias e do 13º salário, nem integrará os salários, remunerações e subsídios.
Está correto o que se afirma em
Provas
Sobre a elaboração do Plano Nacional de Segurança Pública e Defesa Social, é correto afirmar que
Provas
Instituído pela Lei nº 13.964/19, o Juiz das Garantias será responsável pelo controle da legalidade da investigação criminal e pela salvaguarda dos direitos individuais cuja franquia tenha sido reservada à autorização prévia do Poder Judiciário.
A inovação legislativa foi objeto de arguição de inconstitucionalidade perante o Supremo Tribunal Federal nos autos das ADI 6298, 6299, 6300 e 6305, com julgamento concluído em 23/08/2023 e ata publicada em 31/08/2023.
Acerca da previsão do Juiz das Garantias nos sistemas legal, judiciário e policial e em atenção ao julgamento proferido pelo STF, é correto afirmar que
Provas
A Política Nacional de Segurança Pública e Defesa Social pressupõe a identificação e adoção de mecanismos de monitoramento e avaliação das ações implementadas.
Para tanto, devem ser fixados indicadores públicos e metas de excelência que apresentem, de forma objetiva, os resultados pretendidos.
Avalie, com base na Lei nº 13.675/2018, se a aferição de metas para os órgãos que integram o Sistema Único de Segurança Pública deverá observar os seguintes parâmetros:
I. As atividades de polícia judiciária serão aferidas, entre outros fatores, pela maior ou menor incidência de infrações penais e administrativas em determinada área.
II. As atividades do corpo de bombeiros militares serão aferidas, entre outros fatores, pelas ações de prevenção e preparação para emergências e desastres.
III. A eficiência do sistema prisional será aferida, entre outros fatores, com base no índice de reiteração criminal dos egressos.
Está correto o que se afirma em
Provas
Read Text II and answer the question that follows.
Text II
June 15, 2023 - Debates over Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts are currently thriving, including debates over the degree to which corporate diversity efforts are valuable, whether chief diversity officers can succeed, and whether corporate diversity commitments can produce lasting change.
Over the past year, at least a dozen U.S. state legislatures have proposed or passed laws targeting DEI efforts, including laws aimed at limiting DEI roles and efforts in businesses and higher education and laws eliminating DEI spending, trainings, and statements at public institutions. Moreover, with the U.S. Supreme Court poised to address affirmative action in two cases involving the consideration of race in higher education admissions this summer, debates in the U.S. regarding DEI initiatives are likely far from over.
At the same time, DEI-related legal requirements continue to grow in other jurisdictions, and with global financial institutions facing expanding environmental, social, and governance (ESG)- related trends and regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, as well as global expectations regarding their role in ESG, including DEI-related corporate developments and initiatives, these matters are likely to continue to work their way into capital allocations and the costs of doing business, as well as into the expectations of certain stakeholders.
This widening gap between global expectations and regulation regarding DEI-related matters and the concerns of some constituents in the U.S. over the role of DEI in corporate decision-making is likely to continue growing for the foreseeable future, putting companies between the proverbial rock and hard place.
What these developments make clear is that corporate DEI efforts are, and likely have been for some time, riskier than many companies may initially appreciate. And the risks associated with DEI initiatives are only positioned to grow and expand as companies look to thread the DEI needle and make a broader and potentially more divergent set of stakeholders happy, or at least less annoyed, with their DEI-related commitments and initiatives. In this article, we discuss the top four legal risks that companies often fail to address in their DEI efforts.
[…]
(From https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/diversity-matters-four-scarylegal-risks-hiding-your-dei-program-2023-06-15/)
Provas
Read Text II and answer the question that follows.
Text II
June 15, 2023 - Debates over Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts are currently thriving, including debates over the degree to which corporate diversity efforts are valuable, whether chief diversity officers can succeed, and whether corporate diversity commitments can produce lasting change.
Over the past year, at least a dozen U.S. state legislatures have proposed or passed laws targeting DEI efforts, including laws aimed at limiting DEI roles and efforts in businesses and higher education and laws eliminating DEI spending, trainings, and statements at public institutions. Moreover, with the U.S. Supreme Court poised to address affirmative action in two cases involving the consideration of race in higher education admissions this summer, debates in the U.S. regarding DEI initiatives are likely far from over.
At the same time, DEI-related legal requirements continue to grow in other jurisdictions, and with global financial institutions facing expanding environmental, social, and governance (ESG)- related trends and regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, as well as global expectations regarding their role in ESG, including DEI-related corporate developments and initiatives, these matters are likely to continue to work their way into capital allocations and the costs of doing business, as well as into the expectations of certain stakeholders.
This widening gap between global expectations and regulation regarding DEI-related matters and the concerns of some constituents in the U.S. over the role of DEI in corporate decision-making is likely to continue growing for the foreseeable future, putting companies between the proverbial rock and hard place.
What these developments make clear is that corporate DEI efforts are, and likely have been for some time, riskier than many companies may initially appreciate. And the risks associated with DEI initiatives are only positioned to grow and expand as companies look to thread the DEI needle and make a broader and potentially more divergent set of stakeholders happy, or at least less annoyed, with their DEI-related commitments and initiatives. In this article, we discuss the top four legal risks that companies often fail to address in their DEI efforts.
[…]
(From https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/diversity-matters-four-scarylegal-risks-hiding-your-dei-program-2023-06-15/)
Provas
Read Text II and answer the question that follows.
Text II
June 15, 2023 - Debates over Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts are currently thriving, including debates over the degree to which corporate diversity efforts are valuable, whether chief diversity officers can succeed, and whether corporate diversity commitments can produce lasting change.
Over the past year, at least a dozen U.S. state legislatures have proposed or passed laws targeting DEI efforts, including laws aimed at limiting DEI roles and efforts in businesses and higher education and laws eliminating DEI spending, trainings, and statements at public institutions. Moreover, with the U.S. Supreme Court poised to address affirmative action in two cases involving the consideration of race in higher education admissions this summer, debates in the U.S. regarding DEI initiatives are likely far from over.
At the same time, DEI-related legal requirements continue to grow in other jurisdictions, and with global financial institutions facing expanding environmental, social, and governance (ESG)- related trends and regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, as well as global expectations regarding their role in ESG, including DEI-related corporate developments and initiatives, these matters are likely to continue to work their way into capital allocations and the costs of doing business, as well as into the expectations of certain stakeholders.
This widening gap between global expectations and regulation regarding DEI-related matters and the concerns of some constituents in the U.S. over the role of DEI in corporate decision-making is likely to continue growing for the foreseeable future, putting companies between the proverbial rock and hard place.
What these developments make clear is that corporate DEI efforts are, and likely have been for some time, riskier than many companies may initially appreciate. And the risks associated with DEI initiatives are only positioned to grow and expand as companies look to thread the DEI needle and make a broader and potentially more divergent set of stakeholders happy, or at least less annoyed, with their DEI-related commitments and initiatives. In this article, we discuss the top four legal risks that companies often fail to address in their DEI efforts.
[…]
(From https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/diversity-matters-four-scarylegal-risks-hiding-your-dei-program-2023-06-15/)
I. Debates over DEI in the US have reached a successful closure.
II. ESG-related trends have had little effect over global financial institutions.
III. Regarding legal risks in DEI initiatives, companies still have some way to go.
Choose the correct answer
Provas
(Adapted from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/03/its-
dangerous-work-new-generation-of-indigenous-activists-battle-to-save-the-amazon)
Provas
(Adapted from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/03/its-
dangerous-work-new-generation-of-indigenous-activists-battle-to-save-the-amazon)
Provas
Caderno Container