Foram encontradas 140 questões.
Nesse contexto, considere como exemplos concretos o fechamento de uma rua para eventos festivos, a utilização de uma praia para realização de casamento, a instalação de bancas de jornais em calçadas e a instalação de restaurante em universidade pública.
Considerando os casos supramencionados, os instrumentos de utilização especial da propriedade utilizados são, respectivamente:
Provas
- Organização AdministrativaAdministração IndiretaAutarquias, Agências Reguladoras e Executivas
- Organização AdministrativaAdministração IndiretaEmpresas Públicas e Sociedades de Economia Mista
A pessoa jurídica Alfa desenvolve atividade típica de estado, foi criada por lei, lhe sendo conferidos poderes normativos, seus dirigentes possuem mandato certo, possui privilégios processuais e fiscais;
A pessoa jurídica Beta é sociedade limitada, teve sua criação autorizada por lei, possui capital unicamente público e explora atividade econômica, em regime não concorrencial.
A pessoa jurídica Gama, sociedade anônima, teve sua criação autorizada por lei, possui capital misto, com a maioria do capital votante nas mãos do poder público e presta serviço público mediante delegação estatal.
A pessoa jurídica Delta foi criada por lei e celebrou contrato de gestão com o Ministério supervisor, adquirindo vantagens especiais e, em troca, se comprometendo a cumprir plano de reestruturação definido no próprio contrato de gestão para se tornar mais eficiente.
Nesse sentido, é possível dizer que as pessoas jurídicas acima mencionadas são respectivamente:
Provas
Referida concessionária interrompeu a prestação do serviço elétrico para usuários supramencionados em razão de enchente que assolou o Estado, colocando em risco a segurança das instalações. No mês subsequente interrompeu a prestação, para os mesmos usuários, em razão do inadimplemento por parte deles.
Nesse contexto, no que tange à continuidade do serviço público, quanto ao fornecimento de energia elétrica pela concessionaria Alfa para os usuários supramencionados, assinale a alternativa correta segundo a lei e a jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça.
Provas
A sociedade de economia mista federal Alfa, pessoa jurídica de direito privado exploradora de atividade econômica do ramo energético, adquiriu sala comercial para consecução das suas atividades.
A empresa pública federal Beta, pessoa jurídica de direito privado prestadora de serviço público de transporte, adquiriu terreno para construção de sua sede.
A autarquia federal Ômega, pessoa jurídica de direito público, responsável pela regulação do setor de telecomunicações, adquiriu prédio comercial para consecução de suas atividades.
A sociedade empresária Gama, pessoa jurídica de direito privado, delegatária de serviço público, adquiriu salão comercial para construção de academia de ginástica para seus funcionários.
Diante do exposto, em tema de bens públicos, assinale a alternativa correta quanto aos imóveis adquiridos.
Provas
Nesse cenário, em tema de serviços públicos, considerando as disposições da citada lei e respeitado o procedimento legal, é correto afirmar que o Poder Concedente poderá
Provas
Read Text II and answer the question that follows.
Text II
June 15, 2023 - Debates over Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts are currently thriving, including debates over the degree to which corporate diversity efforts are valuable, whether chief diversity officers can succeed, and whether corporate diversity commitments can produce lasting change.
Over the past year, at least a dozen U.S. state legislatures have proposed or passed laws targeting DEI efforts, including laws aimed at limiting DEI roles and efforts in businesses and higher education and laws eliminating DEI spending, trainings, and statements at public institutions. Moreover, with the U.S. Supreme Court poised to address affirmative action in two cases involving the consideration of race in higher education admissions this summer, debates in the U.S. regarding DEI initiatives are likely far from over.
At the same time, DEI-related legal requirements continue to grow in other jurisdictions, and with global financial institutions facing expanding environmental, social, and governance (ESG)- related trends and regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, as well as global expectations regarding their role in ESG, including DEI-related corporate developments and initiatives, these matters are likely to continue to work their way into capital allocations and the costs of doing business, as well as into the expectations of certain stakeholders.
This widening gap between global expectations and regulation regarding DEI-related matters and the concerns of some constituents in the U.S. over the role of DEI in corporate decision-making is likely to continue growing for the foreseeable future, putting companies between the proverbial rock and hard place.
What these developments make clear is that corporate DEI efforts are, and likely have been for some time, riskier than many companies may initially appreciate. And the risks associated with DEI initiatives are only positioned to grow and expand as companies look to thread the DEI needle and make a broader and potentially more divergent set of stakeholders happy, or at least less annoyed, with their DEI-related commitments and initiatives. In this article, we discuss the top four legal risks that companies often fail to address in their DEI efforts.
[…]
(From https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/diversity-matters-four-scarylegal-risks-hiding-your-dei-program-2023-06-15/)
Provas
Read Text II and answer the question that follows.
Text II
June 15, 2023 - Debates over Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts are currently thriving, including debates over the degree to which corporate diversity efforts are valuable, whether chief diversity officers can succeed, and whether corporate diversity commitments can produce lasting change.
Over the past year, at least a dozen U.S. state legislatures have proposed or passed laws targeting DEI efforts, including laws aimed at limiting DEI roles and efforts in businesses and higher education and laws eliminating DEI spending, trainings, and statements at public institutions. Moreover, with the U.S. Supreme Court poised to address affirmative action in two cases involving the consideration of race in higher education admissions this summer, debates in the U.S. regarding DEI initiatives are likely far from over.
At the same time, DEI-related legal requirements continue to grow in other jurisdictions, and with global financial institutions facing expanding environmental, social, and governance (ESG)- related trends and regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, as well as global expectations regarding their role in ESG, including DEI-related corporate developments and initiatives, these matters are likely to continue to work their way into capital allocations and the costs of doing business, as well as into the expectations of certain stakeholders.
This widening gap between global expectations and regulation regarding DEI-related matters and the concerns of some constituents in the U.S. over the role of DEI in corporate decision-making is likely to continue growing for the foreseeable future, putting companies between the proverbial rock and hard place.
What these developments make clear is that corporate DEI efforts are, and likely have been for some time, riskier than many companies may initially appreciate. And the risks associated with DEI initiatives are only positioned to grow and expand as companies look to thread the DEI needle and make a broader and potentially more divergent set of stakeholders happy, or at least less annoyed, with their DEI-related commitments and initiatives. In this article, we discuss the top four legal risks that companies often fail to address in their DEI efforts.
[…]
(From https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/diversity-matters-four-scarylegal-risks-hiding-your-dei-program-2023-06-15/)
Provas
Read Text II and answer the question that follows.
Text II
June 15, 2023 - Debates over Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) efforts are currently thriving, including debates over the degree to which corporate diversity efforts are valuable, whether chief diversity officers can succeed, and whether corporate diversity commitments can produce lasting change.
Over the past year, at least a dozen U.S. state legislatures have proposed or passed laws targeting DEI efforts, including laws aimed at limiting DEI roles and efforts in businesses and higher education and laws eliminating DEI spending, trainings, and statements at public institutions. Moreover, with the U.S. Supreme Court poised to address affirmative action in two cases involving the consideration of race in higher education admissions this summer, debates in the U.S. regarding DEI initiatives are likely far from over.
At the same time, DEI-related legal requirements continue to grow in other jurisdictions, and with global financial institutions facing expanding environmental, social, and governance (ESG)- related trends and regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, as well as global expectations regarding their role in ESG, including DEI-related corporate developments and initiatives, these matters are likely to continue to work their way into capital allocations and the costs of doing business, as well as into the expectations of certain stakeholders.
This widening gap between global expectations and regulation regarding DEI-related matters and the concerns of some constituents in the U.S. over the role of DEI in corporate decision-making is likely to continue growing for the foreseeable future, putting companies between the proverbial rock and hard place.
What these developments make clear is that corporate DEI efforts are, and likely have been for some time, riskier than many companies may initially appreciate. And the risks associated with DEI initiatives are only positioned to grow and expand as companies look to thread the DEI needle and make a broader and potentially more divergent set of stakeholders happy, or at least less annoyed, with their DEI-related commitments and initiatives. In this article, we discuss the top four legal risks that companies often fail to address in their DEI efforts.
[…]
(From https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/diversity-matters-four-scarylegal-risks-hiding-your-dei-program-2023-06-15/)
I. Debates over DEI in the US have reached a successful closure.
II. ESG-related trends have had little effect over global financial institutions.
III. Regarding legal risks in DEI initiatives, companies still have some way to go.
Choose the correct answer
Provas
(Adapted from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/03/its-
dangerous-work-new-generation-of-indigenous-activists-battle-to-save-the-amazon)
Provas
(Adapted from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/sep/03/its-
dangerous-work-new-generation-of-indigenous-activists-battle-to-save-the-amazon)
Provas
Caderno Container