Foram encontradas 334 questões.
Considere a charge e as afirmações abaixo.
I. A charge ilustra a desigualdade da qualidade do ensino nas escolas públicas e privadas apenas nos aspectos de infraestrutura.
II. A falta de homogeneidade na qualidade educacional pública e privada é um dos motivos de defesa da ação afirmativa de cotas nas universidades públicas.
III. A charge mostra que os mais ricos conseguem, geralmente, ter acesso a uma educação de melhor qualidade.
Está correto o que se afirma somente em
Provas
- LegislaçãoLei 9.394/1996: Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional
- Temas Educacionais Pedagógicos
Considerando a LDB (9394/96), analise as afirmações abaixo.
I. Prevê-se um núcleo comum para o currículo do Ensino Fundamental e Médio e uma parte diversificada em função de características locais. II. Prevê-se gestão democrática do ensino público e progressiva autonomia pedagógica e administrativa das unidades escolares. III. Prevê-se a formação dos especialistas da educação em Curso Superior de Pedagogia ou em Programas de Pós- Graduação. Está correto o que se afirma emProvas
Considere o gráfico, o texto e as afirmações abaixo.
“O Brasil dispõe hoje de condições para oferecer Educação a Distância com bastante competência, capaz de aprimorar o ensino ministrado em sala de aula e de fazê-lo chegar a um maior número de brasileiros, nas regiões mais remotas do país” (SOUZA, 2002). Os métodos e técnicas de comunicação hoje disponíveis possibilitam levar educação a milhões de estudantes e, simultaneamente, preparar milhares de professores acelerando, sobretudo, a formação destes profissionais de ensino.
Por ser um mercado com um enorme potencial, faz-se necessário enfatizar a importância do levantamento da situação atual da EAD nas IES, no Brasil.
Os padrões de qualidade exigidos pelo MEC (2003b) para oficializar um curso superior a distância são os mesmos de um curso presencial, no que se refere às competências e habilidades a serem adquiridas durante a formação do aluno. A carga horária de ambos é equivalente, assim como a integralização curricular. Os processos seletivos devem apresentar edital, ser públicos e isonômicos. Os diplomas registrados possuem o mesmo valor dos obtidos em cursos presenciais. Os cursos passam pela Avaliação das Condições de Ensino.
Fonte: FGV-EAESP/GVPESQUISA 18/248
RELATÓRIO DE PESQUISA Nº 12/2004
I. A modalidade EaD (Ensino à Distância) é prevista por lei apenas para o Ensino Superior.
II. As matrículas em EaD e em cursos presenciais têm apresentado taxas constantes de crescimento.
III. O texto sugere que os cursos a distância são uma possibilidade de superar o déficit educacional no país.
Está correto o que se afirma em
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
In the passage “The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole” the meaning of the phrasal verb is
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
The alternative that brings the best synonym to the bold underline idiom in the passage “Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010” is
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
Read the following passages:
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
The underlined bold words are
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
According to the text, it’s not correct to say that
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
The suing against Knoedler & Company gallery was established by
Provas
Read the text and answer question.
Lawsuits claim Knoedler made huge profits on fakes For more than a dozen years the Upper East Side gallery Knoedler & Company was “substantially dependent” on profits it made from selling a mysterious collection of artwork that is at the center of a federal forgery investigation, former clients of this former gallery have charged in court papers.
The analysis is based on financial records turned over as part of a lawsuit against the gallery filed by Domenico and Eleanore De Sole, who in 2004 paid $8.3 million for a painting attributed to Mark Rothko that they now say is a worthless fake.
The Rothko is one of approximately 40 works that Knoedler, which closed last year, obtained from Glafira Rosales, a littleknown dealer whose collection of works attributed to Modernist masters has no documented provenance and is the subject of an F.B.I. investigation.
Between 1996 and 2008, the suit asserts, Knoedler earned approximately $60 million from works that Ms. Rosales provided on consignment or sold outright to the gallery and cleared $40 million in profits. In one year, 2002, for example, the complaint says the gallery’s entire profit — $5.6 million — was derived from the sale of Ms. Rosales’s works.
“Knoedler’s viability as a business was substantially — and, in some years, almost entirely — dependent on sales from the Rosales Collection,” the De Soles claimed last month in an amended version of the suit they filed this year.
While the forgery allegations are well known and have been the subject of three federal lawsuits against Knoedler, the recent filings expand the known number of Rosales artworks that were handled by the gallery, which was in business for 165 years, and assert that they played a pivotal role in the gallery’s success. After the F.B.I. issued subpoenas to the gallery in the fall of 2009, Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s owner, halted the sale of any Rosales works. Knoedler ended up losing money that year and in 2010, the court papers say.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/22/arts/design/knoedler-made-huge-profits-on-fake-rothkolawsuit- claims.html?hpw&_r=0
The alternative that brings the most comprehensive idea about the text is
Provas
Considere os quatro seguintes valores para uma determinada variável:
| VALORES | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 |
É correto afirmar que a variância e o desvio padrão são respectivamente iguais a:
Provas
Caderno Container