Foram encontradas 95 questões.
2375762
Ano: 2007
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: FCC
Orgão: Câm. Deputados
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: FCC
Orgão: Câm. Deputados
Analise:
Disco 1 Disco 2 Disco 3 Disco 4
A1 A2 A3 Ap
B1 B2 Bp B3
C1 Cp C2 C3
Dp D1 D2 D3
O esquema acima, de quatro discos independentes demonstrando segmentos de dados e de paridade, representa uma proteção do armazenamento com RAID
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Instruções: Para responder à questão considere o texto abaixo.
Google Adds a Safeguard on Privacy for Searchers
By MIGUEL HELFT
By MIGUEL HELFT
SAN FRANCISCO, March 14 — Web search companies collect records of the searches that people conduct, a fact that has long generated fears among privacy advocates and some Internet users that valuable personal data could be misused.
Now Google is taking a step to ease those concerns. The company keeps logs of all searches, along with digital identifiers linking them to specific computers and Internet browsers. It said on Wednesday that it would start to make those logs anonymous after 18 to 24 months, making it much harder to connect search records to a person. Under current practices, the company keeps the logs intact indefinitely.
“We have decided to make this change with feedback from privacy advocates, regulators worldwide and, of course, from our users,” said Nicole Wong, Google’s deputy general counsel.
But it is unclear whether the change will have its intended effect. Privacy advocates reacted with a mix of praise and dismay to it.
“This is really the first time we have seen them make a decision to try and work out the conflict between wanting to be pro-privacy and collecting all the world’s information,” said Ari Schwartz, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, an advocacy group. “They are not going to keep a profile on you indefinitely.”
Others were less enthusiastic. “I think it is an absolute disaster for online privacy,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
Ms. Wong said Google uses the search data internally only to improve its search engine and other services. She added that Google would release search data only if compelled by a subpoena. Even so, Google was the only major search engine to resist a Justice Department subpoena for vast amounts of search data last year — a move that drew praise from privacy advocates.
Just how personally revealing such data can be became evident last year, when AOL released records of the searches conducted by 657,000 Americans for the benefit of researchers. While AOL did not identify the people behind the searches, reporters from The New York Times were able to track down some of them quickly through their search requests.
The ensuing flap caused AOL to tighten its privacy policies. The company now keeps search histories for only 13 months and does not link them to Internet protocol addresses — digital tags that can identify a specific computer.
For its part, Yahoo keeps search data for “as long as it is useful,” said a spokeswoman, Nissa Anklesaria. And Microsoft said that while it does not keep search histories alongside I.P. addresses, it can connect the two if law enforcement requests it.
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/technology/15googles.html_r=1&oref=login)
According to the text, privacy advocates
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Instruções: Para responder à questão considere o texto abaixo.
Google Adds a Safeguard on Privacy for Searchers
By MIGUEL HELFT
By MIGUEL HELFT
SAN FRANCISCO, March 14 — Web search companies collect records of the searches that people conduct, a fact that has long generated fears among privacy advocates and some Internet users that valuable personal data could be misused.
Now Google is taking a step to ease those concerns. The company keeps logs of all searches, along with digital identifiers linking them to specific computers and Internet browsers. It said on Wednesday that it would start to make those logs anonymous after 18 to 24 months, making it much harder to connect search records to a person. Under current practices, the company keeps the logs intact indefinitely.
“We have decided to make this change with feedback from privacy advocates, regulators worldwide and, of course, from our users,” said Nicole Wong, Google’s deputy general counsel.
But it is unclear whether the change will have its intended effect. Privacy advocates reacted with a mix of praise and dismay to it.
“This is really the first time we have seen them make a decision to try and work out the conflict between wanting to be pro-privacy and collecting all the world’s information,” said Ari Schwartz, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, an advocacy group. “They are not going to keep a profile on you indefinitely.”
Others were less enthusiastic. “I think it is an absolute disaster for online privacy,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
Ms. Wong said Google uses the search data internally only to improve its search engine and other services. She added that Google would release search data only if compelled by a subpoena. Even so, Google was the only major search engine to resist a Justice Department subpoena for vast amounts of search data last year — a move that drew praise from privacy advocates.
Just how personally revealing such data can be became evident last year, when AOL released records of the searches conducted by 657,000 Americans for the benefit of researchers. While AOL did not identify the people behind the searches, reporters from The New York Times were able to track down some of them quickly through their search requests.
The ensuing flap caused AOL to tighten its privacy policies. The company now keeps search histories for only 13 months and does not link them to Internet protocol addresses — digital tags that can identify a specific computer.
For its part, Yahoo keeps search data for “as long as it is useful,” said a spokeswoman, Nissa Anklesaria. And Microsoft said that while it does not keep search histories alongside I.P. addresses, it can connect the two if law enforcement requests it.
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/technology/15googles.html_r=1&oref=login)
Segundo o texto,
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Instruções: Para responder à questão considere o texto abaixo.
Google Adds a Safeguard on Privacy for Searchers
By MIGUEL HELFT
By MIGUEL HELFT
SAN FRANCISCO, March 14 — Web search companies collect records of the searches that people conduct, a fact that has long generated fears among privacy advocates and some Internet users that valuable personal data could be misused.
Now Google is taking a step to ease those concerns. The company keeps logs of all searches, along with digital identifiers linking them to specific computers and Internet browsers. It said on Wednesday that it would start to make those logs anonymous after 18 to 24 months, making it much harder to connect search records to a person. Under current practices, the company keeps the logs intact indefinitely.
“We have decided to make this change with feedback from privacy advocates, regulators worldwide and, of course, from our users,” said Nicole Wong, Google’s deputy general counsel.
But it is unclear whether the change will have its intended effect. Privacy advocates reacted with a mix of praise and dismay to it.
“This is really the first time we have seen them make a decision to try and work out the conflict between wanting to be pro-privacy and collecting all the world’s information,” said Ari Schwartz, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, an advocacy group. “They are not going to keep a profile on you indefinitely.”
Others were less enthusiastic. “I think it is an absolute disaster for online privacy,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
Ms. Wong said Google uses the search data internally only to improve its search engine and other services. She added that Google would release search data only if compelled by a subpoena. Even so, Google was the only major search engine to resist a Justice Department subpoena for vast amounts of search data last year — a move that drew praise from privacy advocates.
Just how personally revealing such data can be became evident last year, when AOL released records of the searches conducted by 657,000 Americans for the benefit of researchers. While AOL did not identify the people behind the searches, reporters from The New York Times were able to track down some of them quickly through their search requests.
The ensuing flap caused AOL to tighten its privacy policies. The company now keeps search histories for only 13 months and does not link them to Internet protocol addresses — digital tags that can identify a specific computer.
For its part, Yahoo keeps search data for “as long as it is useful,” said a spokeswoman, Nissa Anklesaria. And Microsoft said that while it does not keep search histories alongside I.P. addresses, it can connect the two if law enforcement requests it.
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/technology/15googles.html_r=1&oref=login)
No texto, o pronome sublinhado them refere-se a
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Instruções: Para responder à questão considere o texto abaixo.
Google Adds a Safeguard on Privacy for Searchers
By MIGUEL HELFT
By MIGUEL HELFT
SAN FRANCISCO, March 14 — Web search companies collect records of the searches that people conduct, a fact that has long generated fears among privacy advocates and some Internet users that valuable personal data could be misused.
Now Google is taking a step to ease those concerns. The company keeps logs of all searches, along with digital identifiers linking them to specific computers and Internet browsers. It said on Wednesday that it would start to make those logs anonymous after 18 to 24 months, making it much harder to connect search records to a person. Under current practices, the company keeps the logs intact indefinitely.
“We have decided to make this change with feedback from privacy advocates, regulators worldwide and, of course, from our users,” said Nicole Wong, Google’s deputy general counsel.
But it is unclear whether the change will have its intended effect. Privacy advocates reacted with a mix of praise and dismay to it.
“This is really the first time we have seen them make a decision to try and work out the conflict between wanting to be pro-privacy and collecting all the world’s information,” said Ari Schwartz, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, an advocacy group. “They are not going to keep a profile on you indefinitely.”
Others were less enthusiastic. “I think it is an absolute disaster for online privacy,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
Ms. Wong said Google uses the search data internally only to improve its search engine and other services. She added that Google would release search data only if compelled by a subpoena. Even so, Google was the only major search engine to resist a Justice Department subpoena for vast amounts of search data last year — a move that drew praise from privacy advocates.
Just how personally revealing such data can be became evident last year, when AOL released records of the searches conducted by 657,000 Americans for the benefit of researchers. While AOL did not identify the people behind the searches, reporters from The New York Times were able to track down some of them quickly through their search requests.
The ensuing flap caused AOL to tighten its privacy policies. The company now keeps search histories for only 13 months and does not link them to Internet protocol addresses — digital tags that can identify a specific computer.
For its part, Yahoo keeps search data for “as long as it is useful,” said a spokeswoman, Nissa Anklesaria. And Microsoft said that while it does not keep search histories alongside I.P. addresses, it can connect the two if law enforcement requests it.
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/technology/15googles.html_r=1&oref=login)
No texto, ease significa
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Instruções: Para responder à questão considere o texto abaixo.
Google Adds a Safeguard on Privacy for Searchers
By MIGUEL HELFT
By MIGUEL HELFT
SAN FRANCISCO, March 14 — Web search companies collect records of the searches that people conduct, a fact that has long generated fears among privacy advocates and some Internet users that valuable personal data could be misused.
Now Google is taking a step to ease those concerns. The company keeps logs of all searches, along with digital identifiers linking them to specific computers and Internet browsers. It said on Wednesday that it would start to make those logs anonymous after 18 to 24 months, making it much harder to connect search records to a person. Under current practices, the company keeps the logs intact indefinitely.
“We have decided to make this change with feedback from privacy advocates, regulators worldwide and, of course, from our users,” said Nicole Wong, Google’s deputy general counsel.
But it is unclear whether the change will have its intended effect. Privacy advocates reacted with a mix of praise and dismay to it.
“This is really the first time we have seen them make a decision to try and work out the conflict between wanting to be pro-privacy and collecting all the world’s information,” said Ari Schwartz, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, an advocacy group. “They are not going to keep a profile on you indefinitely.”
Others were less enthusiastic. “I think it is an absolute disaster for online privacy,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
Ms. Wong said Google uses the search data internally only to improve its search engine and other services. She added that Google would release search data only if compelled by a subpoena. Even so, Google was the only major search engine to resist a Justice Department subpoena for vast amounts of search data last year — a move that drew praise from privacy advocates.
Just how personally revealing such data can be became evident last year, when AOL released records of the searches conducted by 657,000 Americans for the benefit of researchers. ............ AOL did not identify the people behind the searches, reporters from The New York Times were able to track down some of them quickly through their search requests.
The ensuing flap caused AOL to tighten its privacy policies. The company now keeps search histories for only 13 months and does not link them to Internet protocol addresses — digital tags that can identify a specific computer.
For its part, Yahoo keeps search data for “as long as it is useful,” said a spokeswoman, Nissa Anklesaria. And Microsoft said that while it does not keep search histories alongside I.P. addresses, it can connect the two if law enforcement requests it.
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/technology/15googles.html_r=1&oref=login)
A palavra que preenche corretamente a lacuna indicada no texto é
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Instruções: Para responder à questão considere o texto abaixo.
Google Adds a Safeguard on Privacy for Searchers
By MIGUEL HELFT
By MIGUEL HELFT
SAN FRANCISCO, March 14 — Web search companies collect records of the searches that people conduct, a fact that has long generated …......… among privacy advocates and some Internet users that valuable personal data could be misused.
Now Google is taking a step to ease those concerns. The company keeps logs of all searches, along with digital identifiers linking them to specific computers and Internet browsers. It said on Wednesday that it would start to make those logs anonymous after 18 to 24 months, making it much harder to connect search records to a person. Under current practices, the company keeps the logs intact indefinitely.
“We have decided to make this change with feedback from privacy advocates, regulators worldwide and, of course, from our users,” said Nicole Wong, Google’s deputy general counsel.
But it is unclear whether the change will have its intended effect. Privacy advocates reacted with a mix of praise and dismay to it.
“This is really the first time we have seen them make a decision to try and work out the conflict between wanting to be pro-privacy and collecting all the world’s information,” said Ari Schwartz, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology, an advocacy group. “They are not going to keep a profile on you indefinitely.”
Others were less enthusiastic. “I think it is an absolute disaster for online privacy,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.
Ms. Wong said Google uses the search data internally only to improve its search engine and other services. She added that Google would release search data only if compelled by a subpoena. Even so, Google was the only major search engine to resist a Justice Department subpoena for vast amounts of search data last year — a move that drew praise from privacy advocates.
Just how personally revealing such data can be became evident last year, when AOL released records of the searches conducted by 657,000 Americans for the benefit of researchers. While AOL did not identify the people behind the searches, reporters from The New York Times were able to track down some of them quickly through their search requests.
The ensuing flap caused AOL to tighten its privacy policies. The company now keeps search histories for only 13 months and does not link them to Internet protocol addresses — digital tags that can identify a specific computer.
For its part, Yahoo keeps search data for “as long as it is useful,” said a spokeswoman, Nissa Anklesaria. And Microsoft said that while it does not keep search histories alongside I.P. addresses, it can connect the two if law enforcement requests it.
(Adapted from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/15/technology/15googles.html_r=1&oref=login)
A palavra que preenche corretamente a lacuna indicada no texto é
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Atenção: A questão refere-se ao texto a seguir.
O grave problema representado pelas crianças abandonadas remonta à Antiguidade, estendendo-se por toda a Idade Média, conforme estuda John Boswell em The Kindness of Strangers. Mas foi na Época Moderna que a preocupação com a infância abandonada mostrou-se mais candente, a partir do momento em que a pobreza se tornou onerosa para o Estado e a idéia de que o aumento populacional embasava a riqueza das nações tomou contornos definidos. Em Portugal, a legislação deixava às Câmaras a tarefa de passar o encargo da criação dos enjeitados para as Santas Casas de Misericórdia, procedimento que, como bem viu Charles Boxer, vigorou em todo o Império Luso, constituindo-se em um dos seus pilares. Em Salvador e no Rio de Janeiro os mecanismos de recolhimento de expostos já estariam delineados na primeira metade do século XVIII, atestando, segundo Laima Mesgravis, a importância urbana de tais centros. Mas, justamente em Minas, no século XVIII a capitania mais urbanizada da colônia, a situação permaneceu confusa. Há indícios de que as irmandades tomaram para si a tarefa de cuidar das crianças expostas, conforme consta, por exemplo, do Estatuto da Irmandade de Santa Ana, Vila Rica, criada em 1730 e preocupada, em seu artigo 2º. , em fundar, tão logo seus recursos o permitissem, “uma casa de expostos e asilo de menores desvalidos”. Na prática, entretanto, as evidências pendem mais para que se credite ao nobre Senado da Câmara a função de pôr e dispor da vida das crianças abandonadas. Em sua célebre Memória Histórica da Capitania de Minas Gerais (...), José Joaquim da Rocha incluía a criação dos enjeitados entre as despesas de pelo menos três Câmaras Municipais: as de Vila Nova da Rainha (Caeté), Vila do Príncipe e São João del-Rei. O fato de omitir tal encargo quando tratou das demais vilas deve antes ser atribuído a descuido do que à ausência dos demais Senados na criação dos bebês abandonados.
(MELLO E SOUZA, Laura de. Norma e conflito. Aspectos da história
de Minas no século XVIII. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG, 2006, p. 64.)
A frase está redigida com clareza e correção em:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Atenção: A questão refere-se ao texto a seguir.
O grave problema representado pelas crianças abandonadas remonta à Antiguidade, estendendo-se por toda a Idade Média, conforme estuda John Boswell em The Kindness of Strangers. Mas foi na Época Moderna que a preocupação com a infância abandonada mostrou-se mais candente, a partir do momento em que a pobreza se tornou onerosa para o Estado e a idéia de que o aumento populacional embasava a riqueza das nações tomou contornos definidos. Em Portugal, a legislação deixava às Câmaras a tarefa de passar o encargo da criação dos enjeitados para as Santas Casas de Misericórdia, procedimento que, como bem viu Charles Boxer, vigorou em todo o Império Luso, constituindo-se em um dos seus pilares. Em Salvador e no Rio de Janeiro os mecanismos de recolhimento de expostos já estariam delineados na primeira metade do século XVIII, atestando, segundo Laima Mesgravis, a importância urbana de tais centros. Mas, justamente em Minas, no século XVIII a capitania mais urbanizada da colônia, a situação permaneceu confusa. Há indícios de que as irmandades tomaram para si a tarefa de cuidar das crianças expostas, conforme consta, por exemplo, do Estatuto da Irmandade de Santa Ana, Vila Rica, criada em 1730 e preocupada, em seu artigo 2º. , em fundar, tão logo seus recursos o permitissem, “uma casa de expostos e asilo de menores desvalidos”. Na prática, entretanto, as evidências pendem mais para que se credite ao nobre Senado da Câmara a função de pôr e dispor da vida das crianças abandonadas. Em sua célebre Memória Histórica da Capitania de Minas Gerais (...), José Joaquim da Rocha incluía a criação dos enjeitados entre as despesas de pelo menos três Câmaras Municipais: as de Vila Nova da Rainha (Caeté), Vila do Príncipe e São João del-Rei. O fato de omitir tal encargo quando tratou das demais vilas deve antes ser atribuído a descuido do que à ausência dos demais Senados na criação dos bebês abandonados.
(MELLO E SOUZA, Laura de. Norma e conflito. Aspectos da história
de Minas no século XVIII. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG, 2006, p. 64.)
Na prática, entretanto, as evidências pendem mais para que se credite ao nobre Senado da Câmara a função de pôr e dispor da vida das crianças abandonadas.
O fragmento acima está clara e corretamente reescrito em:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Atenção: A questão refere-se ao texto a seguir.
O grave problema representado pelas crianças abandonadas remonta à Antiguidade, estendendo-se por toda a Idade Média, conforme estuda John Boswell em The Kindness of Strangers. Mas foi na Época Moderna que a preocupação com a infância abandonada mostrou-se mais candente, a partir do momento em que a pobreza se tornou onerosa para o Estado e a idéia de que o aumento populacional embasava a riqueza das nações tomou contornos definidos. Em Portugal, a legislação deixava às Câmaras a tarefa de passar o encargo da criação dos enjeitados para as Santas Casas de Misericórdia, procedimento que, como bem viu Charles Boxer, vigorou em todo o Império Luso, constituindo-se em um dos seus pilares. Em Salvador e no Rio de Janeiro os mecanismos de recolhimento de expostos já estariam delineados na primeira metade do século XVIII, atestando, segundo Laima Mesgravis, a importância urbana de tais centros. Mas, justamente em Minas, no século XVIII a capitania mais urbanizada da colônia, a situação permaneceu confusa. Há indícios de que as irmandades tomaram para si a tarefa de cuidar das crianças expostas, conforme consta, por exemplo, do Estatuto da Irmandade de Santa Ana, Vila Rica, criada em 1730 e preocupada, em seu artigo 2º. , em fundar, tão logo seus recursos o permitissem, “uma casa de expostos e asilo de menores desvalidos”. Na prática, entretanto, as evidências pendem mais para que se credite ao nobre Senado da Câmara a função de pôr e dispor da vida das crianças abandonadas. Em sua célebre Memória Histórica da Capitania de Minas Gerais (...), José Joaquim da Rocha incluía a criação dos enjeitados entre as despesas de pelo menos três Câmaras Municipais: as de Vila Nova da Rainha (Caeté), Vila do Príncipe e São João del-Rei. O fato de omitir tal encargo quando tratou das demais vilas deve antes ser atribuído a descuido do que à ausência dos demais Senados na criação dos bebês abandonados.
(MELLO E SOUZA, Laura de. Norma e conflito. Aspectos da história
de Minas no século XVIII. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG, 2006, p. 64.)
Considerados o contexto e o sentido originais, contém fragmento do texto corretamente compreendido:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container