Foram encontradas 400 questões.
Dispõe o artigo 38 da Corte Internacional de Haia:
Art. 38 – 1. A Corte, cuja função é decidir de acordo com o direito internacional as controvérsias que lhe forem submetidas, aplicará:a) as convenções internacionais, quer gerais, quer especiais, que estabeleçam regras expressamente reconhecidas pelos Estados litigantes;
b) o costume internacional, como prova de uma prática geral aceita como sendo o direito;
c) os princípios gerais de direito, reconhecidos pelas nações civilizadas;
d) sob ressalva da disposição do art. 59, as decisões judiciárias e a doutrina dos juristas mais qualificados das diferentes nações, como meio auxiliar para a determinação das regras de direito.
2. A presente disposição não prejudicará a faculdade da Corte de decidir uma questão ex aequo et bono, se as partes com isso concordarem.
Com base no dispositivo transcrito acima, julgue os itens subseqüentes.
O art. 38 do Estatuto da Corte Internacional de Haia enumera o rol taxativo e hierarquicamente organizado das fontes do direito internacional público.
Provas
As relações jurídicas entre os Estados, no contexto de uma sociedade jurídica internacional descentralizada, desenvolvem-se de forma horizontal e coordenada.
Provas
Duas doutrinas principais fundamentam o direito internacional público: a voluntarista e a objetivista. A primeira sustenta que é na vontade dos Estados que está o fundamento do direito das gentes; nela se inseriria a teoria dos direitos fundamentais. A segunda, por sua vez, sustenta o fundamento do direito internacional na pressuposta existência de uma norma ou princípio acima dos Estados, como, por exemplo, a teoria do consentimento.
Provas
Segundo a opinião de Celso D. de Albuquerque Mello, o direito constitucional internacional é apenas um ramo do direito constitucional, sem objeto e método próprios, que disciplina normas constitucionais de alcance internacional, devendo, portanto, ser aplicado também em consonância com as regras do direito internacional público.
Provas
O direito civil influenciou em grande medida a formação de institutos do direito internacional público.
Provas
Em relação à sua denominação, pode-se afirmar que a expressão direito transnacional, embora mais ampla que a denominação direito internacional público, já consagrada, tem como mérito a superação da dicotomia entre direito público e direito privado.
Provas
Text LI – questions 47 through 50
When preparing a speech, public speakers today are often offered this advice “1) Just tell’em what you’re going to tell’em; 2) tell’em; 3) then, tell’em what you told’em.”
This sage advice is a distilled version of classical speech structure outlined more than 2,000 years ago, when philosophers examined the great public speeches of the day, such as Pericles famed funeral oration delivered in 430 BC, and the impassioned courtroom speeches of Cicero, considered the most eloquent speaker of all of Rome, to determine the secrets of their success. The ancient Greeks and Romans concluded that all public speech could be broken down into six separate parts:
1 the introduction (exordium),
2 the proposition (narratio),
3 the outline of what’s to follow (partilio),
4 the proof (confirmatio),
5 the refutation (refutatio),
6 the conclusion (peroratio).
Successful speakers, these philosophers pointed out, each had different goals and, depending on which part of the speech they were in, used different rhetorical devices to achieve them. During a speech’s introduction, for example, the speaker should establish ethos, or credibility, with the audience. To do so, a speaker may explain that she shares the same concerns and values as her listeners. During the proposition, the speaker briefly states her case, for example, “we should have more field trips at school” or “income taxes are too high”. In the outline, the speaker prepares the listener with what to expect next. In addition to helping the speaker organize her thoughts, stating the outline of the speech also helped the speaker remember what she had planned to say, especially in the days before teleprompters and cue cards. The proof usually makes up the bulk of a speech, and in it, the speaker should make appeals to logos, or logic, possibly by bringing in outside sources and references to support her case. During the refutation, the speaker attacks the validity of her opponent’s arguments. In the conclusion section, speakers often summarize their position, build emotion and end with a call to action, usually by making an appeal to pathos, or emotion.
Internet: http://www.pbs.org/greatspeeches/criticscorn/cc_pr.html (with adaptations).
Suitable titles for text LI include
The present use of classical speech structure.
Provas
Text LI – questions 47 through 50
When preparing a speech, public speakers today are often offered this advice “1) Just tell’em what you’re going to tell’em; 2) tell’em; 3) then, tell’em what you told’em.”
This sage advice is a distilled version of classical speech structure outlined more than 2,000 years ago, when philosophers examined the great public speeches of the day, such as Pericles famed funeral oration delivered in 430 BC, and the impassioned courtroom speeches of Cicero, considered the most eloquent speaker of all of Rome, to determine the secrets of their success. The ancient Greeks and Romans concluded that all public speech could be broken down into six separate parts:
1 the introduction (exordium),
2 the proposition (narratio),
3 the outline of what’s to follow (partilio),
4 the proof (confirmatio),
5 the refutation (refutatio),
6 the conclusion (peroratio).
Successful speakers, these philosophers pointed out, each had different goals and, depending on which part of the speech they were in, used different rhetorical devices to achieve them. During a speech’s introduction, for example, the speaker should establish ethos, or credibility, with the audience. To do so, a speaker may explain that she shares the same concerns and values as her listeners. During the proposition, the speaker briefly states her case, for example, “we should have more field trips at school” or “income taxes are too high”. In the outline, the speaker prepares the listener with what to expect next. In addition to helping the speaker organize her thoughts, stating the outline of the speech also helped the speaker remember what she had planned to say, especially in the days before teleprompters and cue cards. The proof usually makes up the bulk of a speech, and in it, the speaker should make appeals to logos, or logic, possibly by bringing in outside sources and references to support her case. During the refutation, the speaker attacks the validity of her opponent’s arguments. In the conclusion section, speakers often summarize their position, build emotion and end with a call to action, usually by making an appeal to pathos, or emotion.
Internet: http://www.pbs.org/greatspeeches/criticscorn/cc_pr.html (with adaptations).
Suitable titles for text LI include
The old-fashioned structure of classical speeches.
Provas
Text LI – questions 47 through 50
When preparing a speech, public speakers today are often offered this advice “1) Just tell’em what you’re going to tell’em; 2) tell’em; 3) then, tell’em what you told’em.”
This sage advice is a distilled version of classical speech structure outlined more than 2,000 years ago, when philosophers examined the great public speeches of the day, such as Pericles famed funeral oration delivered in 430 BC, and the impassioned courtroom speeches of Cicero, considered the most eloquent speaker of all of Rome, to determine the secrets of their success. The ancient Greeks and Romans concluded that all public speech could be broken down into six separate parts:
1 the introduction (exordium),
2 the proposition (narratio),
3 the outline of what’s to follow (partilio),
4 the proof (confirmatio),
5 the refutation (refutatio),
6 the conclusion (peroratio).
Successful speakers, these philosophers pointed out, each had different goals and, depending on which part of the speech they were in, used different rhetorical devices to achieve them. During a speech’s introduction, for example, the speaker should establish ethos, or credibility, with the audience. To do so, a speaker may explain that she shares the same concerns and values as her listeners. During the proposition, the speaker briefly states her case, for example, “we should have more field trips at school” or “income taxes are too high”. In the outline, the speaker prepares the listener with what to expect next. In addition to helping the speaker organize her thoughts, stating the outline of the speech also helped the speaker remember what she had planned to say, especially in the days before teleprompters and cue cards. The proof usually makes up the bulk of a speech, and in it, the speaker should make appeals to logos, or logic, possibly by bringing in outside sources and references to support her case. During the refutation, the speaker attacks the validity of her opponent’s arguments. In the conclusion section, speakers often summarize their position, build emotion and end with a call to action, usually by making an appeal to pathos, or emotion.
Internet: http://www.pbs.org/greatspeeches/criticscorn/cc_pr.html (with adaptations).
Suitable titles for text LI include
Classical speech structure as a model for modern speeches.
Provas
Text LI – questions 47 through 50
When preparing a speech, public speakers today are often offered this advice “1) Just tell’em what you’re going to tell’em; 2) tell’em; 3) then, tell’em what you told’em.”
This sage advice is a distilled version of classical speech structure outlined more than 2,000 years ago, when philosophers examined the great public speeches of the day, such as Pericles famed funeral oration delivered in 430 BC, and the impassioned courtroom speeches of Cicero, considered the most eloquent speaker of all of Rome, to determine the secrets of their success. The ancient Greeks and Romans concluded that all public speech could be broken down into six separate parts:
1 the introduction (exordium),
2 the proposition (narratio),
3 the outline of what’s to follow (partilio),
4 the proof (confirmatio),
5 the refutation (refutatio),
6 the conclusion (peroratio).
Successful speakers, these philosophers pointed out, each had different goals and, depending on which part of the speech they were in, used different rhetorical devices to achieve them. During a speech’s introduction, for example, the speaker should establish ethos, or credibility, with the audience. To do so, a speaker may explain that she shares the same concerns and values as her listeners. During the proposition, the speaker briefly states her case, for example, “we should have more field trips at school” or “income taxes are too high”. In the outline, the speaker prepares the listener with what to expect next. In addition to helping the speaker organize her thoughts, stating the outline of the speech also helped the speaker remember what she had planned to say, especially in the days before teleprompters and cue cards. The proof usually makes up the bulk of a speech, and in it, the speaker should make appeals to logos, or logic, possibly by bringing in outside sources and references to support her case. During the refutation, the speaker attacks the validity of her opponent’s arguments. In the conclusion section, speakers often summarize their position, build emotion and end with a call to action, usually by making an appeal to pathos, or emotion.
Internet: http://www.pbs.org/greatspeeches/criticscorn/cc_pr.html (with adaptations).
Suitable titles for text LI includeClassical speeches made easy.
Provas
Caderno Container