Foram encontradas 199 questões.
Ana, servidora pública no âmbito do estado de Goiás, em conluio
com João, requereu o pagamento de determinado benefício
estatutário ao qual sabidamente não tinha direito. Apesar da
injuridicidade, João o deferiu poucos dias depois, tendo se
iniciado, incontinente, o recebimento mensal do benefício por
Ana. Seis anos depois, os mecanismos de controle interno
detectaram o ilícito praticado.
À luz dessa narrativa, é correto afirmar que, nos termos da Lei Estadual nº 13.800/2001,
À luz dessa narrativa, é correto afirmar que, nos termos da Lei Estadual nº 13.800/2001,
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Pedro, servidor ocupante de cargo de provimento efetivo no
Estado de Goiás, em exercício há cinco anos ininterruptos, após
regular processo administrativo-disciplinar, veio a ser demitido. O
cargo que ocupava, por sua vez, de nomenclatura X, foi
transformado no cargo Y, que passou a ser ocupado por Maria. A
demissão de Pedro, no entanto, foi invalidada pelo Poder
Judiciário.
De acordo com a Lei Estadual nº 20.756/2020, é correto afirmar que ocorrerá
De acordo com a Lei Estadual nº 20.756/2020, é correto afirmar que ocorrerá
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Maria, servidora do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, teve
conhecimento, em sua vida privada, de que Joana, também
servidora dessa estrutura orgânica, não era assídua e frequente ao
serviço, o que comprometia o regular funcionamento do setor a
que estava vinculada.
Ao analisar o Código de Ética para os Servidores do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, Maria concluiu corretamente que
Ao analisar o Código de Ética para os Servidores do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, Maria concluiu corretamente que
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Determinado processo administrativo foi encaminhado para
apreciação do Ministério Público de Contas do Estado de Goiás,
ocasião em que, com base nas regras de distribuição, foi
encaminhado ao Procurador de Contas XX. No momento da
distribuição, dois assessores do Procurador-Geral de Contas
debateram sobre a possibilidade, ou não, de serem estabelecidas
orientações a serem observadas pelo Procurador que atuará no
caso, quanto à análise do seu mérito.
Ao final do debate, os assessores concluíram corretamente que
Ao final do debate, os assessores concluíram corretamente que
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Joana foi empossada como auditora do Tribunal de Contas do
Estado de Goiás. Ciente de que, entre as atribuições afetas ao seu
cargo, estava a de substituir os Conselheiros, consultou a Lei
Orgânica do Tribunal em relação aos requisitos e às circunstâncias
afetas a essa substituição, tendo concluído corretamente que
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Determinada Câmara do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás
aplicou sanções a João, ordenador de despesas no âmbito da
Administração Pública indireta do poder público estadual, isto por
ter constatado ilegalidade na realização de uma despesa.
Irresignado com o teor dessa decisão, João almejava obter a sua
reforma com a interposição do recurso cabível.
À luz do Regimento Interno do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, é correto afirmar que
À luz do Regimento Interno do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, é correto afirmar que
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
READ THE TEXT AND ANSWER QUESTION:
Artificial intelligence and the future of humanity
Thinking and learning about artificial intelligence are the mental
equivalent of a fission chain reaction. The questions get really big,
really quickly.
The most familiar concerns revolve around short-term impacts:
the opportunities for economic productivity, health care,
manufacturing, education, solving global challenges such as
climate change and, on the flip side, the risks of mass
unemployment, disinformation, killer robots, and concentrations
of economic and strategic power.
Each of these is critical, but they’re only the most immediate
considerations. The deeper issue is our capacity to live meaningful,
fulfilling lives in a world in which we no longer have intelligence
supremacy.
As long as humanity has existed, we’ve had an effective monopoly
on intelligence. We have been, as far as we know, the smartest
entities in the universe.
At its most noble, this extraordinary gift of our evolution drives us
to explore, discover and expand. Over the past roughly 50,000
years—accelerating 10,000 years ago and then even more steeply
from around 300 years ago—we’ve built a vast intellectual empire
made up of science, philosophy, theology, engineering,
storytelling, art, technology and culture.
If our civilisations—and in varying ways our individual lives—have
meaning, it is found in this constant exploration, discovery and
intellectual expansion.
Intelligence is the raw material for it all. But what happens when
we’re no longer the smartest beings in the universe? We haven’t
yet achieved artificial general intelligence (AGI)—the term for an
AI that could do anything we can do. But there’s no barrier in
principle to doing so, and no reason it wouldn’t quickly outstrip us
by orders of magnitude.
Even if we solve the economic equality questions through
something like a universal basic income and replace notions of
‘paid work’ with ‘meaningful activity’, how are we going to spend
our lives in ways that we find meaningful, given that we’ve evolved
to strive and thrive and compete?
Adapted from https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/artificialintelligence-and-the-future-of-humanity/
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container