Magna Concursos

Foram encontradas 50 questões.

1858707 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Português
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB
enunciado 1858707-1

Ainda sobre o trecho “Refletir sobre a linguagem exige apenas um bom professor, quadro-negro e a intuição dos alunos. Essa é uma maneira de ensinar a raciocinar cientificamente com pouquíssimos recursos.” (linhas 11 e 12), pode-se afirmar que a oração que se inicia pelo anafórico “essa” possui, relacionada ao período anterior, o objetivo de

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1858704 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Português
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB
enunciado 1858704-1

No trecho “As aulas de língua portuguesa podem não apenas versar sobre o português e suas variedades, elas podem ser uma oportunidade para se conhecer outras línguas, compará- las.” (linhas 16 a 18), pode-se inferir que as autoras pretenderam validar a lógica da

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1858703 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Português
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB
enunciado 1858703-1

Acerca do trecho “(..) são também uma intervenção na sociedade, não apenas para desmistificar muitos dos preconceitos que a sociedade brasileira ainda tem quanto à língua, mas principalmente para formar cidadãos críticos, que sabem avaliar um argumento.” (linhas 21 a 23), uma forma de confrontá- lo é

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1858702 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Português
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB
enunciado 1858702-1

Uma das áreas da linguística mais estudadas atualmente é o gerativismo linguístico, que cria o conceito de Gramática Gerativa. Um dos linguistas mais respeitados nesse campo de pesquisa e conhecido também como o “pai” dessa gramática é

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1858700 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Português
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB
enunciado 1858700-1

É possível afirmar que o texto das autoras refere-se à chamada “língua natural”. Tal língua é - predominantemente - escopo do estudo

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1858698 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Português
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB
enunciado 1858698-1

Do título “Gramáticas: rota alternativa para as aulas de português” e da leitura atenta ao texto, pode-se pressupor do fato de o signo linguístico “gramática” estar flexionado no plural e estar seguido da expressão “rota alternativa” que

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1858697 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Português
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB
enunciado 1858697-1

O texto tem o objeto precípuo de estimular o professor a entender o seu papel como

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1809251 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB

The real reason Apple and Google want you to use your phone less

NIR EYAL MAY 19, 2019


If tech is “hijacking your brain” with their “irresistible” products, as some tech critics claim, why are these companies now acting against their own

interests?

This week Apple follows Google by announcing features to help people cut back on their tech use. Why would the companies that make

your phone want you to use it less? If tech is “hijacking your brain” with their “irresistible” products, as some tech critics claim, why are these

companies now acting against their own interests? Perhaps the tech giants have had a change of heart or have been persuaded by public pressure

to change their ways? Hardly. I studied the sophisticated psychology these companies deploy to keep people hooked and wrote a book about how

they do it. At first glance, it appears their business model would benefit from addiction. The more you use your phone, the more money they

make through the apps you buy and the ads you view.

However, the addiction story falls short when considering the long-term interests of these companies. Apple and Google are making it

easier for consumers to cut back on phone use because it is in their interest to do so. In this case, what’s good for the user is also good for these

companies’ bottom lines. Apple and Google don’t want you to get addicted. Addiction is a compulsive harmful behavior. Rather, they’d prefer you

form healthy habits with your digital devices.

Consider why you wear a seatbelt. In 1968, the Federal Government mandated that seat belts come equipped in all cars. However,

nineteen years before any such regulation, American car makers started offering seat belts as a feature. The laws came well after car makers

started offering seatbelts because that’s what consumers wanted. Car makers who sold safer cars sold more.

Similarly, thousands of third-party apps have given smartphone owners ways to moderate tech use with tools to help them monitor how

much time they spend online, turn off access to certain sites, and reduce digital distraction — tools very similar to what Apple and Google recently

announced. I started writing about this burgeoning trend, in what I called “attention retention” devices, back in early 2015 and today there are more

digital wellness products than ever.

As they often do with successful apps built on their platforms, Apple and Google took note of what consumers wanted and decided to

incorporate these features as standard — just as car makers did with seat belts in the 1950s. They also went beyond what app makers can do by

adding features only the operating system makers can offer, like batch notifications to reduce the frequency of intraday interruptions and the ability

to put the phone in “shush” mode by flipping it over.

The history of innovation is littered with examples of new technologies causing unintended harm. As cultural theorist Paul Virilio said,

“When you invent the ship, you also invent the shipwreck.” Although the devices these modern shipbuilders make certainly have potential

negative consequences, like overuse, it’s also in their interests to make their products less harmful.

With few exceptions, when a product harms people, consumers tend to use it less often or find better alternatives. The feature fight

between these two tech rivals benefits everyone. The move to help users create healthy habits with their devices is an example of competition

making products better.

Although they are certainly designed to be persuasive and user-friendly, we aren’t slaves to our technologies and it behooves us to stop

thinking we’re powerless. The tech companies are taking steps to help users rein in device overuse. Now it’s our turn to put these features to use,

buckle down, and buckle up


(Available in: https://www.theladders.com/career-advice/the-reason-apple-and-google-want-you-to-use-your-phone-less. Accessed on May 19th, 2019. Adapted.)

What is the author’s purpose in mentioning “At first glance, it appears their business model would benefit from addiction” in paragraph 1?

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1809236 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB

Which situation best fits the characteristics of English for specific purposes?

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
1809226 Ano: 2019
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IDECAN
Orgão: IF-PB

Based on the concepts and applicability of English for specific purposes (ESP), it can be stated that

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas