Foram encontradas 130 questões.
The pre-Iraq war and pre-9/11 performance of
some secret services is subject to harsh criticism and, in
some countries, various investigations. Governments are
accused to have taken essential decisions based upon
dubious information. The different agencies are blamed
for inter- and intra-agency rivalry blocking the efficiency
of any early warning system. In addition, they are heavily
criticized for delivering the message their political masters
wanted to hear.
We do not want to blame anybody. But we
believe that it is necessary to rethink the whole business
of secret services.
Without knowing the details that obviously led to
serious deficiencies, there are several fundamental
problems with the work of secret services in open,
democratic societies. In democracies, there is often a basic
mistrust towards intelligence gathering. It seems to be a
dirty job. Democracy asks for openness and transparency.
People in democracies do not like the work in a shadow.
Scientists and journalists refrain in general from
cooperation with secret services. They are afraid to
destroy their access to foreign countries and colleagues.
Recruitment of qualified young people has become
difficult.
Dieter Farwick. Internet: http://www.world securitynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=9226 (with adaptations).
From the text above, it can be deduced that
journalists, in general, are very keen to cooperate with secret services.
Provas
The pre-Iraq war and pre-9/11 performance of
some secret services is subject to harsh criticism and, in
some countries, various investigations. Governments are
accused to have taken essential decisions based upon
dubious information. The different agencies are blamed
for inter- and intra-agency rivalry blocking the efficiency
of any early warning system. In addition, they are heavily
criticized for delivering the message their political masters
wanted to hear.
We do not want to blame anybody. But we
believe that it is necessary to rethink the whole business
of secret services.
Without knowing the details that obviously led to
serious deficiencies, there are several fundamental
problems with the work of secret services in open,
democratic societies. In democracies, there is often a basic
mistrust towards intelligence gathering. It seems to be a
dirty job. Democracy asks for openness and transparency.
People in democracies do not like the work in a shadow.
Scientists and journalists refrain in general from
cooperation with secret services. They are afraid to
destroy their access to foreign countries and colleagues.
Recruitment of qualified young people has become
difficult.
Dieter Farwick. Internet: http://www.world securitynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=9226 (with adaptations).
From the text above, it can be deduced that
open democracies welcome the action of intelligence services.
Provas
The pre-Iraq war and pre-9/11 performance of
some secret services is subject to harsh criticism and, in
some countries, various investigations. Governments are
accused to have taken essential decisions based upon
dubious information. The different agencies are blamed
for inter- and intra-agency rivalry blocking the efficiency
of any early warning system. In addition, they are heavily
criticized for delivering the message their political masters
wanted to hear.
We do not want to blame anybody. But we
believe that it is necessary to rethink the whole business
of secret services.
Without knowing the details that obviously led to
serious deficiencies, there are several fundamental
problems with the work of secret services in open,
democratic societies. In democracies, there is often a basic
mistrust towards intelligence gathering. It seems to be a
dirty job. Democracy asks for openness and transparency.
People in democracies do not like the work in a shadow.
Scientists and journalists refrain in general from
cooperation with secret services. They are afraid to
destroy their access to foreign countries and colleagues.
Recruitment of qualified young people has become
difficult.
Dieter Farwick. Internet: http://www.world securitynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=9226 (with adaptations).
From the text above, it can be deduced that
the author deeply criticizes the British secret service.
Provas
The pre-Iraq war and pre-9/11 performance of
some secret services is subject to harsh criticism and, in
some countries, various investigations. Governments are
accused to have taken essential decisions based upon
dubious information. The different agencies are blamed
for inter- and intra-agency rivalry blocking the efficiency
of any early warning system. In addition, they are heavily
criticized for delivering the message their political masters
wanted to hear.
We do not want to blame anybody. But we
believe that it is necessary to rethink the whole business
of secret services.
Without knowing the details that obviously led to
serious deficiencies, there are several fundamental
problems with the work of secret services in open,
democratic societies. In democracies, there is often a basic
mistrust towards intelligence gathering. It seems to be a
dirty job. Democracy asks for openness and transparency.
People in democracies do not like the work in a shadow.
Scientists and journalists refrain in general from
cooperation with secret services. They are afraid to
destroy their access to foreign countries and colleagues.
Recruitment of qualified young people has become
difficult.
Dieter Farwick. Internet: http://www.world securitynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=9226 (with adaptations).
From the text above, it can be deduced that
political issues should not prevail over security matters.
Provas
The pre-Iraq war and pre-9/11 performance of
some secret services is subject to harsh criticism and, in
some countries, various investigations. Governments are
accused to have taken essential decisions based upon
dubious information. The different agencies are blamed
for inter- and intra-agency rivalry blocking the efficiency
of any early warning system. In addition, they are heavily
criticized for delivering the message their political masters
wanted to hear.
We do not want to blame anybody. But we
believe that it is necessary to rethink the whole business
of secret services.
Without knowing the details that obviously led to
serious deficiencies, there are several fundamental
problems with the work of secret services in open,
democratic societies. In democracies, there is often a basic
mistrust towards intelligence gathering. It seems to be a
dirty job. Democracy asks for openness and transparency.
People in democracies do not like the work in a shadow.
Scientists and journalists refrain in general from
cooperation with secret services. They are afraid to
destroy their access to foreign countries and colleagues.
Recruitment of qualified young people has become
difficult.
Dieter Farwick. Internet: http://www.world securitynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=9226 (with adaptations).
From the text above, it can be deduced that
other interests were put above public security by secret service agents.
Provas
The pre-Iraq war and pre-9/11 performance of
some secret services is subject to harsh criticism and, in
some countries, various investigations. Governments are
accused to have taken essential decisions based upon
dubious information. The different agencies are blamed
for inter- and intra-agency rivalry blocking the efficiency
of any early warning system. In addition, they are heavily
criticized for delivering the message their political masters
wanted to hear.
We do not want to blame anybody. But we
believe that it is necessary to rethink the whole business
of secret services.
Without knowing the details that obviously led to
serious deficiencies, there are several fundamental
problems with the work of secret services in open,
democratic societies. In democracies, there is often a basic
mistrust towards intelligence gathering. It seems to be a
dirty job. Democracy asks for openness and transparency.
People in democracies do not like the work in a shadow.
Scientists and journalists refrain in general from
cooperation with secret services. They are afraid to
destroy their access to foreign countries and colleagues.
Recruitment of qualified young people has become
difficult.
Dieter Farwick. Internet: http://www.world securitynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=9226 (with adaptations).
From the text above, it can be deduced that
the American decision to declair war against Iraq was based on doubtless information.
Provas
The pre-Iraq war and pre-9/11 performance of
some secret services is subject to harsh criticism and, in
some countries, various investigations. Governments are
accused to have taken essential decisions based upon
dubious information. The different agencies are blamed
for inter- and intra-agency rivalry blocking the efficiency
of any early warning system. In addition, they are heavily
criticized for delivering the message their political masters
wanted to hear.
We do not want to blame anybody. But we
believe that it is necessary to rethink the whole business
of secret services.
Without knowing the details that obviously led to
serious deficiencies, there are several fundamental
problems with the work of secret services in open,
democratic societies. In democracies, there is often a basic
mistrust towards intelligence gathering. It seems to be a
dirty job. Democracy asks for openness and transparency.
People in democracies do not like the work in a shadow.
Scientists and journalists refrain in general from
cooperation with secret services. They are afraid to
destroy their access to foreign countries and colleagues.
Recruitment of qualified young people has become
difficult.
Dieter Farwick. Internet: http://www.world securitynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=9226 (with adaptations).
From the text above, it can be deduced that
the action of some secret services before September 11 is under bitter criticisms.
Provas
&nb
sp;ilustrada na figura acima. Com
relação às funcionalidades do IE6 acessíveis por meio dessa
janela, julgue os itens de 41 a 44, considerando que o
computador do usuário pertence a uma intranet e tendo por
referência as informações apresentadas na janela ilustrada.Por meio de funcionalidades acessíveis a partir da guia 
, o usuário poderá eliminar cookies que porventura
estejam armazenados em seu computador, na pasta Internet
Temporary Files.
Provas
A criação do Sistema Brasileiro de Inteligência
(SISBIN) e a consolidação da Agência Brasileira de
Inteligência (ABIN) permitem ao Estado brasileiro
institucionalizar a atividade de Inteligência, mediante
uma ação coordenadora do fluxo de informações
necessárias às decisões de governo, no que diz respeito
ao aproveitamento de oportunidades, aos antagonismos
e às ameaças, reais ou potenciais, relativos aos mais
altos interesses da sociedade e do país. Todo o trabalho
de reformulação da atividade vem sendo balizado,
também, por enfoques doutrinários condizentes com o
processo atual de globalização, em que as barreiras
fronteiriças são fluidas, sugerindo cautelas para garantir
a preservação dos interesses da sociedade e do Estado
brasileiros, de forma a salvaguardar a soberania,
a integridade e a harmonia social do país.
Internet: http://www.abin.gov.br/abin/historico.jsp (com adaptações)
Considerando o texto acima, julgue os itens subseqüentes.
As vírgulas que isolam a expressão “reais ou potenciais” (l.8) são obrigatórias, uma vez que se trata de um aposto explicativo.
Provas
Disciplina: Atualidades e Conhecimentos Gerais
Banca: CESPE / CEBRASPE
Orgão: ABIN
A biodiversidade despontou nos anos 80 do século XX entre os temas ambientais globais de grande importância. Acerca desse assunto, julgue os itens a seguir.
A reciclagem de embalagens — como latas de alumínio, papelão, material orgânico etc. — é um setor em que o Brasil tem apresentado bons resultados. Esse processo, além de ajudar na diminuição da demanda por recursos naturais, é um fator na proteção da biodiversidade dos ecossistemas.
Provas
Caderno Container