Magna Concursos

Foram encontradas 47.586 questões.

3664432 Ano: 2025
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: EDUCA
Orgão: Pref. Pedras Fogo-PB
Provas:
TEXT 1

BRAZIL JOINS GROWING LIST OF COUNTRIES BANNING CELLPHONES IN SCHOOLS

Despite questions about the effectiveness of such bans, Brazil is the latest to prohibit the devices amid concerns over impacts on learning and well-being.
A bill that bans students from using cellphones in schools was signed into law in Brazil on Monday, the latest example of lawmakers limiting young people’s use of personal technology in the classroom, amid growing concern about its effect on education and well-being.
Brazil’s Education Ministry said in a statement that the law “aims to safeguard the mental, physical and psychological health of children and adolescents.” The Brazilian President called it an example of “working together for the safety and better learning of our children and young people.”
The law prohibits all students in public and private elementary and secondary schools from using portable electronic devices throughout the school day, the ministry said, though it allows for their educational use and some other exceptions.
Brazil joins several countries that have banned the personal use of cellphones in schools — including the Netherlands, Italy for students up to the third year of middle school, and France for those under 15 — though there are questions as to whether phone bans are effective in achieving their aims.
Excerpt extracted and adapted from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/01/14/brazil-cellphoneschool-ban/
Considering text 1 and its genre, we can correctly classify it as:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3664431 Ano: 2025
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: EDUCA
Orgão: Pref. Pedras Fogo-PB
Provas:
TEXT 1

BRAZIL JOINS GROWING LIST OF COUNTRIES BANNING CELLPHONES IN SCHOOLS

Despite questions about the effectiveness of such bans, Brazil is the latest to prohibit the devices amid concerns over impacts on learning and well-being.
A bill that bans students from using cellphones in schools was signed into law in Brazil on Monday, the latest example of lawmakers limiting young people’s use of personal technology in the classroom, amid growing concern about its effect on education and well-being.
Brazil’s Education Ministry said in a statement that the law “aims to safeguard the mental, physical and psychological health of children and adolescents.” The Brazilian President called it an example of “working together for the safety and better learning of our children and young people.”
The law prohibits all students in public and private elementary and secondary schools from using portable electronic devices throughout the school day, the ministry said, though it allows for their educational use and some other exceptions.
Brazil joins several countries that have banned the personal use of cellphones in schools — including the Netherlands, Italy for students up to the third year of middle school, and France for those under 15 — though there are questions as to whether phone bans are effective in achieving their aims.
Excerpt extracted and adapted from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/01/14/brazil-cellphoneschool-ban/
According to the text 1, it is possible to infer that:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3664430 Ano: 2025
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: EDUCA
Orgão: Pref. Pedras Fogo-PB
Provas:
TEXT 1

BRAZIL JOINS GROWING LIST OF COUNTRIES BANNING CELLPHONES IN SCHOOLS

Despite questions about the effectiveness of such bans, Brazil is the latest to prohibit the devices amid concerns over impacts on learning and well-being.
A bill that bans students from using cellphones in schools was signed into law in Brazil on Monday, the latest example of lawmakers limiting young people’s use of personal technology in the classroom, amid growing concern about its effect on education and well-being.
Brazil’s Education Ministry said in a statement that the law “aims to safeguard the mental, physical and psychological health of children and adolescents.” The Brazilian President called it an example of “working together for the safety and better learning of our children and young people.”
The law prohibits all students in public and private elementary and secondary schools from using portable electronic devices throughout the school day, the ministry said, though it allows for their educational use and some other exceptions.
Brazil joins several countries that have banned the personal use of cellphones in schools — including the Netherlands, Italy for students up to the third year of middle school, and France for those under 15 — though there are questions as to whether phone bans are effective in achieving their aims.
Excerpt extracted and adapted from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/01/14/brazil-cellphoneschool-ban/
Based on text 1, what exceptions exist in Brazil's cellphone ban:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3664429 Ano: 2025
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: EDUCA
Orgão: Pref. Pedras Fogo-PB
Provas:
TEXT 1

BRAZIL JOINS GROWING LIST OF COUNTRIES BANNING CELLPHONES IN SCHOOLS

Despite questions about the effectiveness of such bans, Brazil is the latest to prohibit the devices amid concerns over impacts on learning and well-being.
A bill that bans students from using cellphones in schools was signed into law in Brazil on Monday, the latest example of lawmakers limiting young people’s use of personal technology in the classroom, amid growing concern about its effect on education and well-being.
Brazil’s Education Ministry said in a statement that the law “aims to safeguard the mental, physical and psychological health of children and adolescents.” The Brazilian President called it an example of “working together for the safety and better learning of our children and young people.”
The law prohibits all students in public and private elementary and secondary schools from using portable electronic devices throughout the school day, the ministry said, though it allows for their educational use and some other exceptions.
Brazil joins several countries that have banned the personal use of cellphones in schools — including the Netherlands, Italy for students up to the third year of middle school, and France for those under 15 — though there are questions as to whether phone bans are effective in achieving their aims.
Excerpt extracted and adapted from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/01/14/brazil-cellphoneschool-ban/
According to text 1, what is the primary reason Brazil implemented the cellphone ban in Brazilian schools recently?
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reports that once water is contaminated, it is difficult, costly, and often impossible to remove the pollutants. Currently, 80% of global wastewater goes untreated, and is contaminated by a wide range of substances, from human waste to highly toxic industrial discharges. The type and amount of pollutants in freshwater determines its suitability for human uses such as drinking, bathing, and agriculture.
Pollution of freshwater ecosystems can also impact the habitat and quality of life of fish and other wildlife. This can include pathogens (largely from human and animal waste), organic matter (including nutrients from agricultural run-off such as nitrogen or phosphorus), chemical pollution (from irrigation, domestic wastewater and runoff of mines into rivers) and salinity. Plastics, and chemicals of emerging concern, such as certain pharmaceutical products, are issues for which their extent and impacts on freshwater are largely unknown. A preliminary assessment of water quality in rivers in Latin America, Africa and Asia, “A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality” (Ringler, et al., 2016), estimated that severe pathogenic pollution affects around one third of all rivers, severe organic pollution around one seventh of all rivers, and severe and moderate salinity pollution around one-tenth of all rivers in these regions.
(UNDRR, “Pollution”. Disponível em: www.undrr.org/ understanding-disaster-risk/terminology/hips/tl0028#:~:text=Pollution%20 is%20defined%20as%20the,UN%20data%2C%20n o%20date. Adaptado)
The water quality assessment mentioned in the second paragraph estimates that the pollutant that affects more rivers in Latin America, Africa and Asia is:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reports that once water is contaminated, it is difficult, costly, and often impossible to remove the pollutants. Currently, 80% of global wastewater goes untreated, and is contaminated by a wide range of substances, from human waste to highly toxic industrial discharges. The type and amount of pollutants in freshwater determines its suitability for human uses such as drinking, bathing, and agriculture.
Pollution of freshwater ecosystems can also impact the habitat and quality of life of fish and other wildlife. This can include pathogens (largely from human and animal waste), organic matter (including nutrients from agricultural run-off such as nitrogen or phosphorus), chemical pollution (from irrigation, domestic wastewater and runoff of mines into rivers) and salinity. Plastics, and chemicals of emerging concern, such as certain pharmaceutical products, are issues for which their extent and impacts on freshwater are largely unknown. A preliminary assessment of water quality in rivers in Latin America, Africa and Asia, “A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality” (Ringler, et al., 2016), estimated that severe pathogenic pollution affects around one third of all rivers, severe organic pollution around one seventh of all rivers, and severe and moderate salinity pollution around one-tenth of all rivers in these regions.
(UNDRR, “Pollution”. Disponível em: www.undrr.org/ understanding-disaster-risk/terminology/hips/tl0028#:~:text=Pollution%20 is%20defined%20as%20the,UN%20data%2C%20n o%20date. Adaptado)
De acordo com o segundo parágrafo, um dos poluentes cujo impacto sobre a água doce ainda é em grande parte desconhecido é:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reports that once water is contaminated, it is difficult, costly, and often impossible to remove the pollutants. Currently, 80% of global wastewater goes untreated, and is contaminated by a wide range of substances, from human waste to highly toxic industrial discharges. The type and amount of pollutants in freshwater determines its suitability for human uses such as drinking, bathing, and agriculture.
Pollution of freshwater ecosystems can also impact the habitat and quality of life of fish and other wildlife. This can include pathogens (largely from human and animal waste), organic matter (including nutrients from agricultural run-off such as nitrogen or phosphorus), chemical pollution (from irrigation, domestic wastewater and runoff of mines into rivers) and salinity. Plastics, and chemicals of emerging concern, such as certain pharmaceutical products, are issues for which their extent and impacts on freshwater are largely unknown. A preliminary assessment of water quality in rivers in Latin America, Africa and Asia, “A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality” (Ringler, et al., 2016), estimated that severe pathogenic pollution affects around one third of all rivers, severe organic pollution around one seventh of all rivers, and severe and moderate salinity pollution around one-tenth of all rivers in these regions.
(UNDRR, “Pollution”. Disponível em: www.undrr.org/ understanding-disaster-risk/terminology/hips/tl0028#:~:text=Pollution%20 is%20defined%20as%20the,UN%20data%2C%20n o%20date. Adaptado)
No trecho do segundo parágrafo “This can include pathogens”, o termo destacado em negrito se refere a
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reports that once water is contaminated, it is difficult, costly, and often impossible to remove the pollutants. Currently, 80% of global wastewater goes untreated, and is contaminated by a wide range of substances, from human waste to highly toxic industrial discharges. The type and amount of pollutants in freshwater determines its suitability for human uses such as drinking, bathing, and agriculture.
Pollution of freshwater ecosystems can also impact the habitat and quality of life of fish and other wildlife. This can include pathogens (largely from human and animal waste), organic matter (including nutrients from agricultural run-off such as nitrogen or phosphorus), chemical pollution (from irrigation, domestic wastewater and runoff of mines into rivers) and salinity. Plastics, and chemicals of emerging concern, such as certain pharmaceutical products, are issues for which their extent and impacts on freshwater are largely unknown. A preliminary assessment of water quality in rivers in Latin America, Africa and Asia, “A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality” (Ringler, et al., 2016), estimated that severe pathogenic pollution affects around one third of all rivers, severe organic pollution around one seventh of all rivers, and severe and moderate salinity pollution around one-tenth of all rivers in these regions.
(UNDRR, “Pollution”. Disponível em: www.undrr.org/ understanding-disaster-risk/terminology/hips/tl0028#:~:text=Pollution%20 is%20defined%20as%20the,UN%20data%2C%20n o%20date. Adaptado)
No trecho do primeiro parágrafo “human uses such as drinking, bathing, and agriculture”, a expressão destacada em negrito, no contexto, introduz
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Leia o texto a seguir para responder à questão:
The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reports that once water is contaminated, it is difficult, costly, and often impossible to remove the pollutants. Currently, 80% of global wastewater goes untreated, and is contaminated by a wide range of substances, from human waste to highly toxic industrial discharges. The type and amount of pollutants in freshwater determines its suitability for human uses such as drinking, bathing, and agriculture.
Pollution of freshwater ecosystems can also impact the habitat and quality of life of fish and other wildlife. This can include pathogens (largely from human and animal waste), organic matter (including nutrients from agricultural run-off such as nitrogen or phosphorus), chemical pollution (from irrigation, domestic wastewater and runoff of mines into rivers) and salinity. Plastics, and chemicals of emerging concern, such as certain pharmaceutical products, are issues for which their extent and impacts on freshwater are largely unknown. A preliminary assessment of water quality in rivers in Latin America, Africa and Asia, “A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality” (Ringler, et al., 2016), estimated that severe pathogenic pollution affects around one third of all rivers, severe organic pollution around one seventh of all rivers, and severe and moderate salinity pollution around one-tenth of all rivers in these regions.
(UNDRR, “Pollution”. Disponível em: www.undrr.org/ understanding-disaster-risk/terminology/hips/tl0028#:~:text=Pollution%20 is%20defined%20as%20the,UN%20data%2C%20n o%20date. Adaptado)
The text is mainly about
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Atenção: Para responder à questão, considere o texto a seguir.

lt's time for innovation to transform education



It’s no secret that the U.S. education system is facing numerous challenges. The standardized, one-size-fits-all approach focuses on memorization and rote learning, often failing to cater to the unique needs and talents of individual students. This lack of personalization can lead to disengagement and poor outcomes, leaving students feeling unmotivated and unprepared for life beyond school.


Innovation in education needs funding. But there’s a catch: to receive funding, entrepreneurs usually need to show proof of concept — that their idea works.


That can be tricky for education entrepreneurs who want to think outside the box. In the United States, trusted old models receive funding from legislators because they use outdated measures and assessments to decide “what works” in traditional settings. But it’s exactly those old models and metrics that need to be transformed.


Academic achievement among American students continues to fall behind their global counterparts. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), U.S. students rank 25th out of 37 countries in math proficiency, and similarly low in reading and science.


The fact is, in the U.S., education from 1st to 12th grade has long been more about tradition than innovation. For generations, the school experience has barely changed. Our schools may look the same as our parents’ schools — and their schools looked the same as their parents’. It was more about listening to lectures, memorizing facts, and writing essays than about exploring the things that make each student uniquely themselves.


What if education and imagination could be synonymous? That is the vision the VELA Education Fund aims to realize through its work funding diverse educational models for students across the U.S.


This nonprofit has flipped the script — instead of handing large sums of money to a select few, VELA offers millions of dollars in small grants to thousands of everyday entrepreneurs. This model generates fresh, community-rooted approaches to education. These creators share a self-starting spirit, a desire to meet the needs of the learners and families they serve, and a willingness to rethink the “where, how, and when” of school.


VELA’s model is unique because it instills trust and encourages autonomy in educators, believing that those closest to the problem should be the ones designing its solutions. Unlike other grants, VELA doesn’t require as much proof of concept upfront, allowing funding to drive the outcomes — not the other way around. By awarding smaller grants to a broader range of applicants, it supports a more diverse array of ideas, backgrounds, and educational models. These smaller grants also give recipients the freedom to take risks and be more creative.


“We limit our potential when we limit the people who have access to opportunities to drive social change,” said Meredith Olson, president of VELA. “A few thousand dollars to the right person can fuel innovation on a scale we never imagined.”


So far, VELA has awarded more than $35 million in grants to nearly 2,500 recipients — including microschool founders, homeschool leaders, and many others — who collectively serve over 5 million students across the country. The organization’s continued support sends a strong message to other education funders: trust that families and educators know how to support their learners best — and empower them to do so.


(Adapted from Why we need more Innovation In education & VELA Education Fund Catalyzes Innovatlon In Educatlon)

Segundo o texto, o financiamento proporcionado pela VELA
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas