Foram encontradas 47.586 questões.
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: Legalle
Orgão: Pref. Silveira Martins-RS
Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.
How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?
A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.
The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.
A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.
No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."
That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.
Many of the problems we face today took years to create.
We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.
But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.
Some messes only require a dustpan.
But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.
Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart
Analyze the sentence below:
If you _______ to become a millionaire, you _________ to develop a plan that accounts for realíty, rather than just comp/aining.
Choose the alternative that CORRECTLY completes the logic of the millionaire analogy.
Provas
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: Legalle
Orgão: Pref. Silveira Martins-RS
- Análise sintática | Syntax Parsing
- Gramática - Língua InglesaOrações condicionais | Conditional Clauses
Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.
How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?
A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.
The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.
A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.
No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."
That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.
Many of the problems we face today took years to create.
We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.
But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.
Some messes only require a dustpan.
But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.
Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart
Reconstruct the following segments into a logically and grammatically sound sentence that aligns with the author's argument:
a / realistic / you / if / want,/ success / need / plan / that / acknowledges / obstacles
Regarding this, mark the alternative that presents the CORRECT sentence structure.
Provas
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: Legalle
Orgão: Pref. Silveira Martins-RS
Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.
How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?
A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.
The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.
A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.
No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."
That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.
Many of the problems we face today took years to create.
We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.
But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.
Some messes only require a dustpan.
But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.
Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart
Based on a rigorous critical appraisal of the text's argumentative framework and logical progression, analyze the assertions below:
I. The OODA decision-making loop functions as a permanent, static mechanism where a single isolated action definitively concludes the operational cycle.
II. The author draws a direct analogy to assert that clearing away messes for which one bears no direct responsibility is a routine, inescapable reality of existence.
III. The author warns that prioritizing extreme caution while waiting to craft a flawless blueprint can deteriorate into counterproductive procrastination.
Which of the following statements islare CORRECT?
Provas
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: Legalle
Orgão: Pref. Silveira Martins-RS
Para responder à questão, leia o texto abaixo.
How Will You Get from How Things Are to How Things "Should" Be?
A lot of people get fixated on things that they think "should" happen, but fail to address substantial obstacles in the way. I may even agree with them about what I think "should" happen. But that doesn't mean that it's going to happen. If you're thinking that there is also a danger in being overly cautious or waiting to work out the perfect plan, you're right. That can become a form of procrastination. Acting on an imperfect plan is usually better than waiting until you've worked out every last detail. But at least have some kind of plan that doesn't require a miracle to happen.
The plan that works will also probably not be the plan you started with. You will have to update the plan as you proceed and the situation evolves.
A good model for this process is John Boyd's OODA decision making loop. OODA stands for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. Actions produce responses that provide new information. New information requires reorientation and new decisions will have to be made that lead to new actions, and the loop repeats.
No big changes happened because a bunch of people sat around complaining about how things "should be."
That's like saying "l should be a millionaire." You could be, but you're going to need some kind of plan to get there that realistically acknowledges the obstacles in your way.
Many of the problems we face today took years to create.
We have inherited a big mess. A lot of things happened that "should not" have happened. Mistakes were made.
But that's life. It's going to throw all kinds of things at you that are sub-optimal. Things you didn't "deserve" or ask for. Cleaning up messes you didn't create is as normal as dealing with bad weather.
Some messes only require a dustpan.
But if you want to clean up a really big mess, you're going to need a plan.
Fonte: https://mrjackdonovan.substack.com/p/the-flow-chart
Provas
Observe o infográfico:

A leitura eficiente de gêneros textuais multimodais e de alta densidade informativa, como o infográfico apresentado, pressupõe a mobilização de diferentes estratégias de processamento de texto. Considerando a arquitetura visual do documento e as técnicas de skimming e scanning, assinale a alternativa que descreve corretamente a aplicação dessas estratégias na reconstrução dos sentidos do texto.
Provas
- Gramática - Língua InglesaAdvérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctionsAdvérbios de: lugar, modo, tempo e freqüência | Adverbs of: place, manner, time and frequency
Observe a tirinha a seguir.

A construção do humor na tirinha decorre da combinação entre recursos linguísticos e inferências do leitor. Nesse contexto, os advérbios sometimes e elsewhere contribuem para a organização do enunciado e para a construção de seu sentido. Assinale a alternativa correta.
Provas
Leia o excerto a seguir:
"The local council approved the funding for the new library. ________, they slashed the budget for the municipal arts center; ________, the community's reaction was deeply divided." (Adaptado de notícias locais do portal BBC News).
Considerando as relações lógico-discursivas estabelecidas entre as orações, as lacunas devem ser preenchidas, respectivamente, por um conector de contraste e por um conector de consequência. Assinale a alternativa correta.
Provas
- Gramática - Língua InglesaAdjetivos | AdjectivesComparativo e superlativo de adjetivos | Comparative and superlative
Observe a peça publicitária a seguir.

A publicidade emprega recursos verbais e visuais para construir um efeito persuasivo. Na expressão "a bigger bed", o emprego do adjetivo bigger desempenha papel relevante tanto na organização gramatical quanto na construção do sentido do anúncio. Assinale a alternativa correta.
Provas
Observe as tirinhas da série Peanuts, de Charles Schulz:

A carta enviada por Lucy van Pelt a um anúncio de jornal apresenta uma crítica irônica à liderança de Charlie Brown. No início da leitura da carta, lê-se o seguinte trecho em discurso direto:
“Dear Sir, we are looking for a good manager... The last one we had was a real blockhead.”
Assinale a alternativa que apresenta a reescrita desse trecho em discurso indireto, mantendo a fidelidade ao texto original e aplicando rigorosamente as regras de concordância e sequência temporal da norma-padrão da língua inglesa.
Provas
Leia a estrofe a seguir:
"A chilly Peace infests the Grass
The Sun respectful lies –
Not any Trance of industry
These shadows scrutinize –"
Whose Allies go no more astray
For service or for Glee -
But all mankind deliver here
From whatsoever sea -
(DICKINSON, Emily. Poem 1444. In: The Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson. Boston: Little, Brown, 1924)
No primeiro verso, a poetisa constrói o sintagma nominal "A chilly Peace" que atua como sujeito da oração. Sob a perspectiva da análise sintática e do recurso estilístico empregado, assinale a alternativa correta.
Provas
Caderno Container