Magna Concursos

Foram encontradas 51 questões.

3146625 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: Instituto Access
Orgão: INT
Provas:

A seguir, temos as seguintes afirmações sobre o protocolo TCP:

I. Não é orientado a conexão.

II. Possui controle de fluxo.

III. É confiável, pois o receptor envia confirmação de recebimento de cada pacote transmitido.

Assinale

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3146621 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: Instituto Access
Orgão: INT
Provas:

Marque a opção que não apresenta um protocolo da camada de aplicação do modelo de referência OSI.

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3146616 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: Instituto Access
Orgão: INT
Provas:

Assinale a opção que determina o dispositivo capaz de analisar as características do tráfego de rede de modo permitir ou negar o acesso a um recurso ou conjunto de recursos.

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3146603 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: Instituto Access
Orgão: INT
Provas:

Um algoritmo de roteamento pode ser classificado como (1) ou (2). Nos algoritmos de roteamento (1), os caminhos de roteamento são alterados automaticamente à medida que mudam a carga de tráfego ou a topologia da rede. Enquanto que os algoritmos de roteamento (2) as rotas são alteradas lentamente ao longo do tempo, muitas vezes, por intermédio de alteração manual humana.

No texto acima, (1) e (2) significam, respectivamente,

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
3146580 Ano: 2024
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: Instituto Access
Orgão: INT
Provas:

Levando em consideração que o firewall e servidor web estão configurados adequadamente para tratar requisições realizadas via endereço IP ou nome de um site, um cliente, ao tentar acessar o site por seu nome, recebe uma mensagem de erro relacionada à resolução de nomes. No entanto, ao tentar acessar o mesmo site pelo seu endereço IP, o conteúdo dele é exibido normalmente. Face ao cenário, é possível desconfiar que exista algum problema relacionado ao serviço de

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Choose the best alternative: “Brazilians’ sense of belief in institutions .”

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Choose the best alternative: “People have changed to virtual political protests, ?”

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Leia atentamente o texto a seguir e responda às questões de 17 a 24.

04.08.2024

‘We have reached the limit.’ Clash with Elon Musk prompts calls for social media controls in Brazil

London (CNN) — Brazil’s attorney general has called for social media platforms in the country to be regulated after Elon Musk threatened to disobey a court order banning certain accounts on X and lashed out against “aggressive censorship.”

In a post on X Sunday, Attorney General Jorge Messias wrote: “It is urgent to regulate social networks. We cannot live in a society in which billionaires domiciled abroad have control of social networks and put themselves in a position to violate the rule of law, failing to comply with court orders and threatening our authorities.”

In a statement, Brazil’s Supreme Court described Musk’s defiance as a “flagrant” obstruction of justice and said he should be investigated by the police. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes announced Sunday that he would open an inquiry into the billionaire businessman who owns X.

The standoff is the latest clash between authorities around the world and Musk – a self-declared “free speech absolutist” who has relaxed X’s content moderation policies and reinstated a number of previously blocked accounts after buying the company, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022.

Orlando Silva, a Brazilian lawmaker aligned with the country’s left-wing government, said he would propose a “responsibilities regime for these digital platforms.” “We have reached the limit!” he posted on X, adding that Musk had disrespected the judiciary.

On Saturday, X’s global government affairs team posted that it had been “forced by court decisions to block certain popular accounts in Brazil” and threatened with “daily fines” for non-compliance.

“We do not know which posts are alleged to violate the law. We are prohibited from saying which court or judge issued the order, or on what grounds,” they wrote. They do not believe the orders are constitutional and will challenge them legally where possible, they added.

The Supreme Court had ordered that the accounts be blocked as part of its ongoing investigation into “digital militias,” which, among other things, is looking into the spread of misinformation and incitement of crime under the government of former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro.

Social media platforms have been widely viewed as a catalyst for riots in Brazil that took place on January 8 last year, when hundreds of protesters broke into federal government buildings in the capital Brasilia, in scenes reminiscent of the January 6, 2021, insurrection in the United States.

Musk suggested that Moraes was behind the ban, writing Sunday on X that the judge had “brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil. He should resign or be impeached.”

In a separate post Saturday, he called the court’s decision to block the accounts “aggressive censorship” that “appears to violate the law and will of the people of Brazil.” He said X would defy the court’s order and lift all restrictions.

“As a result, we will probably lose all revenue in Brazil and have to shut down our office there. But principles matter more than profit,” he noted.

X has faced criticism for accommodating government censorship demands in the past, with Musk saying the company has no choice but to comply. For example, it blocked some X accounts in Turkey at the behest of the government ahead of the country’s elections last year, while at the same time contesting the orders in court.

(Internet: <https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/08/tech/elon-musk-brazil-investigation/index.html> )

In “As a result, we will probably lose all revenue in Brazil and have to shut down our office there. But principles matter more than profit”, it is not possible to say that Musk

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Leia atentamente o texto a seguir e responda às questões de 17 a 24.

04.08.2024

‘We have reached the limit.’ Clash with Elon Musk prompts calls for social media controls in Brazil

London (CNN) — Brazil’s attorney general has called for social media platforms in the country to be regulated after Elon Musk threatened to disobey a court order banning certain accounts on X and lashed out against “aggressive censorship.”

In a post on X Sunday, Attorney General Jorge Messias wrote: “It is urgent to regulate social networks. We cannot live in a society in which billionaires domiciled abroad have control of social networks and put themselves in a position to violate the rule of law, failing to comply with court orders and threatening our authorities.”

In a statement, Brazil’s Supreme Court described Musk’s defiance as a “flagrant” obstruction of justice and said he should be investigated by the police. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes announced Sunday that he would open an inquiry into the billionaire businessman who owns X.

The standoff is the latest clash between authorities around the world and Musk – a self-declared “free speech absolutist” who has relaxed X’s content moderation policies and reinstated a number of previously blocked accounts after buying the company, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022.

Orlando Silva, a Brazilian lawmaker aligned with the country’s left-wing government, said he would propose a “responsibilities regime for these digital platforms.” “We have reached the limit!” he posted on X, adding that Musk had disrespected the judiciary.

On Saturday, X’s global government affairs team posted that it had been “forced by court decisions to block certain popular accounts in Brazil” and threatened with “daily fines” for non-compliance.

“We do not know which posts are alleged to violate the law. We are prohibited from saying which court or judge issued the order, or on what grounds,” they wrote. They do not believe the orders are constitutional and will challenge them legally where possible, they added.

The Supreme Court had ordered that the accounts be blocked as part of its ongoing investigation into “digital militias,” which, among other things, is looking into the spread of misinformation and incitement of crime under the government of former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro.

Social media platforms have been widely viewed as a catalyst for riots in Brazil that took place on January 8 last year, when hundreds of protesters broke into federal government buildings in the capital Brasilia, in scenes reminiscent of the January 6, 2021, insurrection in the United States.

Musk suggested that Moraes was behind the ban, writing Sunday on X that the judge had “brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil. He should resign or be impeached.”

In a separate post Saturday, he called the court’s decision to block the accounts “aggressive censorship” that “appears to violate the law and will of the people of Brazil.” He said X would defy the court’s order and lift all restrictions.

“As a result, we will probably lose all revenue in Brazil and have to shut down our office there. But principles matter more than profit,” he noted.

X has faced criticism for accommodating government censorship demands in the past, with Musk saying the company has no choice but to comply. For example, it blocked some X accounts in Turkey at the behest of the government ahead of the country’s elections last year, while at the same time contesting the orders in court.

(Internet: <https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/08/tech/elon-musk-brazil-investigation/index.html> )

From the sentence “Social media platforms have been widely viewed as a catalyst for riots in Brazil that took place on January 8 last year, when hundreds of protesters broke into federal government buildings in the capital Brasilia, in scenes reminiscent of the January 6, 2021, insurrection in the United States”, it is possible to say that

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas

Leia atentamente o texto a seguir e responda às questões de 17 a 24.

04.08.2024

‘We have reached the limit.’ Clash with Elon Musk prompts calls for social media controls in Brazil

London (CNN) — Brazil’s attorney general has called for social media platforms in the country to be regulated after Elon Musk threatened to disobey a court order banning certain accounts on X and lashed out against “aggressive censorship.”

In a post on X Sunday, Attorney General Jorge Messias wrote: “It is urgent to regulate social networks. We cannot live in a society in which billionaires domiciled abroad have control of social networks and put themselves in a position to violate the rule of law, failing to comply with court orders and threatening our authorities.”

In a statement, Brazil’s Supreme Court described Musk’s defiance as a “flagrant” obstruction of justice and said he should be investigated by the police. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes announced Sunday that he would open an inquiry into the billionaire businessman who owns X.

The standoff is the latest clash between authorities around the world and Musk – a self-declared “free speech absolutist” who has relaxed X’s content moderation policies and reinstated a number of previously blocked accounts after buying the company, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022.

Orlando Silva, a Brazilian lawmaker aligned with the country’s left-wing government, said he would propose a “responsibilities regime for these digital platforms.” “We have reached the limit!” he posted on X, adding that Musk had disrespected the judiciary.

On Saturday, X’s global government affairs team posted that it had been “forced by court decisions to block certain popular accounts in Brazil” and threatened with “daily fines” for non-compliance.

“We do not know which posts are alleged to violate the law. We are prohibited from saying which court or judge issued the order, or on what grounds,” they wrote. They do not believe the orders are constitutional and will challenge them legally where possible, they added.

The Supreme Court had ordered that the accounts be blocked as part of its ongoing investigation into “digital militias,” which, among other things, is looking into the spread of misinformation and incitement of crime under the government of former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro.

Social media platforms have been widely viewed as a catalyst for riots in Brazil that took place on January 8 last year, when hundreds of protesters broke into federal government buildings in the capital Brasilia, in scenes reminiscent of the January 6, 2021, insurrection in the United States.

Musk suggested that Moraes was behind the ban, writing Sunday on X that the judge had “brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil. He should resign or be impeached.”

In a separate post Saturday, he called the court’s decision to block the accounts “aggressive censorship” that “appears to violate the law and will of the people of Brazil.” He said X would defy the court’s order and lift all restrictions.

“As a result, we will probably lose all revenue in Brazil and have to shut down our office there. But principles matter more than profit,” he noted.

X has faced criticism for accommodating government censorship demands in the past, with Musk saying the company has no choice but to comply. For example, it blocked some X accounts in Turkey at the behest of the government ahead of the country’s elections last year, while at the same time contesting the orders in court.

(Internet: <https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/08/tech/elon-musk-brazil-investigation/index.html> )

Choose the alternative that better substitutes the underlined preposition in “On Saturday, X’s global government affairs team posted that it had been ‘forced by court decisions to block certain popular accounts in Brazil’ and threatened with ‘daily fines’ for non-compliance”.

 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas